public-webapi@w3.org from March 2007 by date

Wednesday, 28 March 2007

• Proposal in regards to dom node selector utilities Daniel Aquino

Saturday, 31 March 2007

• Re: [XHR] Algorithms Anne van Kesteren

Friday, 30 March 2007

• Re: [XHR] send() "stringification mechanisms of the host language" Simon Pieters
• Re: [XHR] send() "stringification mechanisms of the host language" Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: [XHR] Uppercasing some HTTP methods Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [XHR] Uppercasing some HTTP methods David Håsäther
• [XHR] send() "stringification mechanisms of the host language" Simon Pieters
• Re: [XHR] Uppercasing some HTTP methods Simon Pieters
• Re: [XHR] Editorial: typos Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [XHR] Uppercasing some HTTP methods Anne van Kesteren
• [XHR] Uppercasing some HTTP methods Simon Pieters
• [XHR] Editorial: typos Simon Pieters
• [XHR] "the specification of a proxy"...? Simon Pieters
• [XHR] Algorithms Simon Pieters
• Re: [XHR] Test cases Simon Pieters
• Re: [XHR] Test cases Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [XHR] Test cases Anne van Kesteren
• [XHR] Test cases Simon Pieters

Thursday, 29 March 2007

• Re: upload progress events Bjoern Hoehrmann
• New member - Lachlan Hunt Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: DOM Events Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: DOM Events Stewart Brodie
• Re: DOM Events Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: DOM Events Jean-Yves Bitterlich
• Re: New draft of Progress events spec Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: DOM Events Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: New draft of Progress events spec Jean-Yves Bitterlich
• Re: DOM Events Olli Pettay
• DOM Events Jean-Yves Bitterlich

Wednesday, 28 March 2007

• Re: New draft of Progress events spec Anne van Kesteren
• New draft of Progress events spec Charles McCathieNevile

Thursday, 22 March 2007

• Re: [XHR] Some clarifications denis sureau
• Re: [XHR] Some clarifications denis sureau

Wednesday, 21 March 2007

• Re: [XHR] Some clarifications Charles McCathieNevile
• [XMLHttpRequest] responseText decoding Anne van Kesteren

Tuesday, 20 March 2007

• DOM Core: DOMImplementation.createDocumentType(qualifiedName) requires namespace support Philippe Le Hegaret
• Re: [XMLHttpRequest] readyState values should be available as named constants of the XMLHttpRequest constructor Geoffrey Garen
• Re: [XMLHttpRequest] last call comments Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [XMLHttpRequest] last call comments Julian Reschke
• Re: [XMLHttpRequest] readyState values should be available as named constants of the XMLHttpRequest constructor Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [XMLHttpRequest] last call comments Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [XMLHttpRequest] last call comments Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [XHR] Some clarifications Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [XMLHttpRequest] last call comments Alexey Proskuryakov

Monday, 19 March 2007

• Fwd: Re: New progress event draft Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: [XMLHttpRequest] last call comments Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: [XMLHttpRequest] last call comments Julian Reschke
• Re: [XHR] Some clarifications denis sureau
• RE: New Progress Events spec Gottfried Zimmermann

Sunday, 18 March 2007

• Re: [XHR] Some clarifications Charles McCathieNevile

Saturday, 17 March 2007

• Re: [XHR] Default Content-Type Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [XHR] Some clarifications Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [XMLHttpRequest] last call comments Anne van Kesteren
• [XHR] Default Content-Type Alexey Proskuryakov
• Re: File upload interface (fwd) Ian Hickson
• Re: New Progress Events spec Cameron McCormack

Friday, 16 March 2007

• Re: New Progress Events spec Charles McCathieNevile

Thursday, 15 March 2007

• Ian's Cross-Domain XmlHttpRequest Proposal (was: Fwd: several messages on ContextAgnosticXmlHttpRequest) Chris Holland

Friday, 16 March 2007

• Re: ElementTraversal spec draft Boris Zbarsky

Thursday, 15 March 2007

• Re: ElementTraversal spec draft Bjoern Hoehrmann
• ElementTraversal spec draft Charles McCathieNevile

Wednesday, 14 March 2007

• RE: New Progress Events spec Gottfried Zimmermann
• Re: New Progress Events spec Al Gilman

Monday, 12 March 2007

• Re: Whoah There, Turbo Maciej Stachowiak
• Whoah There, Turbo Maciej Stachowiak

Saturday, 10 March 2007

• [XHR] Some clarifications denis sureau

Friday, 9 March 2007

• Re: [XMLHttpRequest] readyState values should be available as named constants of the XMLHttpRequest constructor Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: [XMLHttpRequest] readyState values should be available as named constants of the XMLHttpRequest constructor Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [XHR] Unespected case Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [XHR] Re: Last Call - XMLHttpRequest Anne van Kesteren
• Re: XHR and clearing event listeners Anne van Kesteren
• Re: XHR and clearing event listeners Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [XHR] Typos and comments Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Review comments of Editors Draft of Progress Events Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Review comments of Editors Draft of Progress Events Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Review comments of Editors Draft of Progress Events Andrew Sledd
• Re: Review comments of Editors Draft of Progress Events Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Review comments of Editors Draft of Progress Events Andrew Sledd

Thursday, 8 March 2007

• Re: Network API editor's draft Gorm Haug Eriksen
• Re: ISSUE-113: How do we represent HTTP POST? Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: ISSUE-113: How do we represent HTTP POST? Maciej Stachowiak
• ISSUE-113: How do we represent HTTP POST? Web APIs Issue Tracker

Wednesday, 7 March 2007

• Re: WheelEvent alignment with MouseWheelEvent Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Network API editor's draft Mike Wilson
• Re: Network API editor's draft Ian Hickson
• Re: Network API editor's draft Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: New Progress Events spec Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Network API editor's draft Ian Hickson
• Re: New Progress Events spec Ian Hickson
• Re: New Progress Events spec Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: [XHR] Unespected case Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: New Progress Events spec Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: New Progress Events spec Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [XHR] Unespected case Diego La Monica
• Re: New Progress Events spec Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: New Progress Events spec Maciej Stachowiak
• Network API editor's draft Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: New Progress Events spec Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: New Progress Events spec Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: New Progress Events spec Charles McCathieNevile

Tuesday, 6 March 2007

• [XMLHttpRequest] readyState values should be available as named constants of the XMLHttpRequest constructor Geoffrey Garen

Wednesday, 7 March 2007

• Re: New Progress Events spec Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: New Progress Events spec Ian Hickson
• New Progress Events spec Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: upload progress events Charles McCathieNevile

Tuesday, 6 March 2007

• Re: upload progress events Boris Zbarsky
• Re: upload progress events Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: upload progress events Boris Zbarsky

Monday, 5 March 2007

• Re: [XHR] Unespected case denis sureau

Tuesday, 6 March 2007

• XHR and clearing event listeners Olli Pettay
• Re: upload progress events Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: upload progress events Anne van Kesteren
• Re: upload progress events Robin Berjon
• Re: upload progress events Charles McCathieNevile
• Staff contact job at W3C Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: upload progress events Charles McCathieNevile
• upload progress events Maciej Stachowiak

Monday, 5 March 2007

• Re: Scope of Progress... Maciej Stachowiak
• Scope of Progress... Charles McCathieNevile

Sunday, 4 March 2007

• Re: [XMLHttpRequest] last call comments Julian Reschke
• Re: [XMLHttpRequest] last call comments Bjoern Hoehrmann
• [XMLHttpRequest] last call comments Julian Reschke

Thursday, 1 March 2007

• [XHR] Unespected case Diego La Monica

Wednesday, 28 February 2007

• [XHR] Re: Last Call - XMLHttpRequest Dan Winship

Thursday, 1 March 2007

• [XHR] Typos and comments Stewart Brodie

Last message date: Saturday, 31 March 2007 13:37:25 UTC