public-web-intents@w3.org from March 2012 by date

Thursday, 29 March 2012

• RE: Home discovery over Web Intents: current status and next Steps Nilsson, Claes1
• Re: Home discovery over Web Intents: current status and next Steps Dave Raggett
• Home discovery over Web Intents: current status and next Steps Giuseppe Pascale
• Re: Proposal to switch to an object-literal Intent constructor Charles Pritchard

Wednesday, 28 March 2012

• Proposal to switch to an object-literal Intent constructor Greg Billock

Tuesday, 27 March 2012

• RE: Web Intents for local network services - Clarification on browser UPnP support Nilsson, Claes1

Monday, 26 March 2012

• [Bug 16529] New: WebIntents extraData from service to client missing bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• Re: Is webintents disabled in the new Chromium and Chrome? James Hawkins

Sunday, 25 March 2012

• Re: Is webintents disabled in the new Chromium and Chrome? Greg Billock
• Is webintents disabled in the new Chromium and Chrome? cheng zheng

Friday, 23 March 2012

• Re: Still looking for background disposition James Hawkins
• Still looking for background disposition Charles Pritchard
• Re: Web Intents for local network services - Clarification on browser UPnP support Clarke Stevens
• Re: Web Intents for local network services - Clarification on browser UPnP support Bob Lund
• Re: Web Intents for local network services - Clarification on browser UPnP support Rich Tibbett
• Re: Web Intents for local network services - Clarification on browser UPnP support Dave Raggett
• Re: Web Intents for local network services - Clarification on browser UPnP support Rich Tibbett

Thursday, 22 March 2012

• RE: Web Intents for local network services - Clarification on browser UPnP support Nilsson, Claes1
• Re: A simpler, webbier approach to Web Intents? Greg Billock
• Re: Web Intents for local network services - Clarification on browser UPnP support Rich Tibbett

Wednesday, 21 March 2012

• Re: Seeking summary of March 20-21 discussions Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com
• Re: Seeking summary of March 20-21 discussions Greg Billock
• RE: A simpler, webbier approach to Web Intents? GAUSMAN, PAUL
• ACTION-511: UPnP/Intents mapping Giuseppe Pascale
• Re: Seeking summary of March 20-21 discussions Robin Berjon
• Seeking summary of March 20-21 discussions Arthur Barstow
• Mapping UPnP/Web Intents Giuseppe Pascale
• Re: Web Intents for local network services - Clarification on browser UPnP support Giuseppe Pascale
• Web Intents for local network services - Clarification on browser UPnP support Nilsson, Claes1
• Re: Web Intents - Screenshot Charles Pritchard

Tuesday, 20 March 2012

• RE: About access to web app through web intent from android app GAUSMAN, PAUL
• Re: Meta-data Paul Kinlan
• About access to web app through web intent from android app cheng zheng
• Meta-data Ivan Pavlov
• Re: Web Intents - Screenshot Paul Kinlan

Monday, 19 March 2012

• Web Intents - Screenshot Jamie Kitson
• Call bridge for Device API and Web Intents Shenzhen F2F meeting Sunruinan

Saturday, 17 March 2012

• Re: Web Intents W3C Editor's Draft 31 January 2012 - Review comments Charles Pritchard

Friday, 16 March 2012

• Web Intents for local network services Nilsson, Claes1

Thursday, 15 March 2012

• Huawei visit during F2F Deepanshu gautam
• RE: Web Intents W3C Editor's Draft 31 January 2012 - Review comments Nilsson, Claes1

Wednesday, 14 March 2012

• Re: Web Intents W3C Editor's Draft 31 January 2012 - Review comments Charles Pritchard
• Re: Web Intents W3C Editor's Draft 31 January 2012 - Review comments James Hawkins
• Re: Web Intents W3C Editor's Draft 31 January 2012 - Review comments Greg Billock
• Re: Web Intents W3C Editor's Draft 31 January 2012 - Review comments Charles Pritchard
• Re: Web Intents W3C Editor's Draft 31 January 2012 - Review comments Greg Billock

Tuesday, 13 March 2012

• Re: Web Intents W3C Editor's Draft 31 January 2012 - Review comments Greg Billock
• Updated wiki on WebIntents/Home Discovery and Web Intents Nilsson, Claes1
• Web Intents W3C Editor's Draft 31 January 2012 - Review comments Nilsson, Claes1

Monday, 12 March 2012

• Re: Adding fields for transfer map to Intent constructor Charles Pritchard
• Re: Adding fields for transfer map to Intent constructor Greg Billock
• Re: Adding fields for transfer map to Intent constructor Charles Pritchard
• Re: Adding fields for transfer map to Intent constructor Charles Pritchard
• Re: Adding fields for transfer map to Intent constructor Greg Billock
• Re: Adding fields for transfer map to Intent constructor Paul Kinlan
• Re: Adding fields for transfer map to Intent constructor Greg Billock
• Re: Adding fields for transfer map to Intent constructor Paul Kinlan
• Re: Adding fields for transfer map to Intent constructor Charles Pritchard
• Re: Adding fields for transfer map to Intent constructor James Hawkins
• Re: Adding fields for transfer map to Intent constructor Greg Billock
• Adding fields for transfer map to Intent constructor Greg Billock

Saturday, 10 March 2012

• RE: Attendees for DAP F2F 20-22 March Deepanshu gautam

Wednesday, 7 March 2012

• Output from the Web Intents Design Push Glenn Jones
• Attendees for DAP F2F 20-22 March Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com

Tuesday, 6 March 2012

• Re: CFC: Attaching 'extras' to the intent payload Greg Billock
• Re: CFC: Attaching 'extras' to the intent payload Paul Kinlan
• Re: CFC: Attaching 'extras' to the intent payload Thomas Steiner
• Re: Web Intents F2F - Shenzhen, China - Week of 19 March 2012 James Hawkins
• Re: CFC: Attaching 'extras' to the intent payload KOMATSU Kensaku

Monday, 5 March 2012

• Re: CFC: Attaching 'extras' to the intent payload Rick Byers
• Re: CFC: Attaching 'extras' to the intent payload timeless
• Re: CFC: Attaching 'extras' to the intent payload Rachel Blum
• CFC: Attaching 'extras' to the intent payload James Hawkins
• Re: Web Intents F2F - Shenzhen, China - Week of 19 March 2012 Arthur Barstow

Saturday, 3 March 2012

• Re: A problem of running demos James Hawkins

Friday, 2 March 2012

• A problem of running demos cheng zheng

Last message date: Thursday, 29 March 2012 13:45:57 UTC