- From: Paul Kinlan <paulkinlan@google.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 16:30:15 +0000
- To: Ivan Pavlov <iipavlov@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-web-intents@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CADGdg3COu+EJcxOgYkvHk_HHrpqjU9+3zMv+ED=7A_NLZGzxsQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Ivan, On the subject of meta data, we have an optional field in the intent object called extras (it is still currently being defined at the moment) - some more information can be found http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/web-intents/raw-file/tip/spec/Overview.html#widl-Intent-getExtra-string-DOMString-key P On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Ivan Pavlov <iipavlov@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi , > > As the intents are designed to exchange data between unknown to each other > clients and servers and the exchange data formats are just recommendatory, > maybe it's a good idea to allow also exchange of some optional, but > standardized meta-data. The http headers are a good example and also a > familiar concept and convention for the most web developers. > > Such meta-data exchange would allow for example data format negotiations > and better error handling on the client for different types of errors. > > Best regards, > -- > *Ivan Pavlov* > https://plus.google.com/102045409508708147521/<https://plus..google.com/102045409508708147521/> > > -- Paul Kinlan Developer Advocate @ Google for Chrome and HTML5 G+: http://plus.ly/paul.kinlan t: +447730517944 tw: @Paul_Kinlan LinkedIn: http://uk.linkedin.com/in/paulkinlan Blog: http://paul.kinlan.me Skype: paul.kinlan
Received on Tuesday, 20 March 2012 16:30:49 UTC