public-sml@w3.org from May 2008 by thread

[Bug 5522] The term "containing element" is not clear bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Saturday, 31 May)

[Bug 5522] The term "containing element" is not clear bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Saturday, 31 May)

[Bug 5520] Why is document defined as a character sequence? bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 29 May)

[Bug 5720] Inconsistent languge describing sml references and schemes bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 29 May)

[Bug 5541] Why is schema-less identification of reference elements important? bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 29 May)

[Bug 5562] SML should define an XHTML href Reference Scheme bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 29 May)

[Bug 5545] Reconcile SML URIs with RFC3986 bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 29 May)

[Bug 5524] Rename section 4.4.1.1 bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 29 May)

[Bug 5520] Why is document defined as a character sequence? bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 29 May)

[Bug 5513] Why does SML define sml:ref instead of using XLink bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 29 May)

[Bug 5522] The term "containing element" is not clear bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 29 May)

[Bug 5541] Why is schema-less identification of reference elements important? bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 29 May)

[Bug 5492] xs:schema lines too long bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 29 May)

[Bug 5720] Inconsistent languge describing sml references and schemes bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 29 May)

[Bug 5720] Inconsistent languge describing sml references and schemes bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 29 May)

[Bug 5721] Statement about definitions in definition docs vs. instance docs would help bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Wednesday, 28 May)

[Bug 5710] Sections 4.1.3 and 4.1.1 - mismatch of definitions bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Wednesday, 28 May)

[Bug 5720] Inconsistent languge describing sml references and schemes bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Wednesday, 28 May)

[Bug 5711] Fuzzy phrase: "essentially the same". bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Wednesday, 28 May)

[Bug 5720] Inconsistent languge describing sml references and schemes bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Wednesday, 28 May)

[w3c sml][agenda] 2008-05-29 SML Telecon Pratul Dublish (Wednesday, 28 May)

[w3c sml][minutes] 2008-05-22 SML Lynn, James (HP Software) (Tuesday, 27 May)

[Bug 5715] add definition of the term 'processor' bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Friday, 23 May)

[Bug 5712] Missing word "global" in schema annotation. bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Friday, 23 May)

[Bug 5713] Minor wording issue in Appendix E bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 22 May)

[Bug 5713] Minor wording issue in Appendix E bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 22 May)

[Bug 5658] restore accidental change to smlif:identityType bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 22 May)

[Bug 5676] schemaComplete should be allowed only at 1 location bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 22 May)

[Bug 5659] schemaComplete default value bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 22 May)

[Bug 5606] Update spec to clarify SML reference resolution bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 22 May)

[Bug 5707] clarify SML reference resolution when sml:uri value is an empty string bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 22 May)

[Bug 5680] fix errors in schematron variable substitution support text & example bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 22 May)

[Bug 5499] Explanation of notation for { } and [ ] bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 22 May)

[Bug 5679] fix disparity between SML & SML-IF specs regarding SML ref targets bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 22 May)

[Bug 5676] schemaComplete should be allowed only at 1 location bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 22 May)

[Bug 5659] schemaComplete default value bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 22 May)

[Bug 5658] restore accidental change to smlif:identityType bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 22 May)

[Bug 5635] impl-defined and impl-dependent used, but not defined bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 22 May)

[Bug 5606] Update spec to clarify SML reference resolution bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 22 May)

[Bug 5505] wrong type for schemaBinding/namespaceBinding/namespace attribute bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 22 May)

[Bug 5713] Minor wording issue in Appendix E bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 22 May)

[Bug 5712] Missing word "global" in schema annotation. bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 22 May)

[Bug 5711] Fuzzy phrase: "essentially the same". bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 22 May)

[Bug 5710] Sections 4.1.3 and 4.1.1 - mismatch of definitions bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 22 May)

[Bug 5678] locid is missing from schema in editors draft bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 22 May)

[Bug 5713] Minor wording issue in Appendix E bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 22 May)

[Bug 5712] Missing word "global" in schema annotation. bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 22 May)

[Bug 5711] Fuzzy phrase: "essentially the same". bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 22 May)

[Bug 5710] Sections 4.1.3 and 4.1.1 - mismatch of definitions bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 22 May)

[Bug 5499] Explanation of notation for { } and [ ] bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 22 May)

[Bug 5505] wrong type for schemaBinding/namespaceBinding/namespace attribute bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 22 May)

[Bug 5676] schemaComplete should be allowed only at 1 location bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 22 May)

[w3c sml] sml:ref and interoperability Smith, Virginia (HP Software) (Thursday, 22 May)

[Bug 5541] Why is schema-less identification of reference elements important? bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 22 May)

[Bug 5707] clarify SML reference resolution when sml:uri value is an empty string bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 22 May)

[w3c sml][agenda] 2008-05-20 SML Telecon John Arwe (Tuesday, 20 May)

[Bug 5678] locid is missing from schema in editors draft bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Tuesday, 20 May)

[Bug 5606] Update spec to clarify SML reference resolution bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Tuesday, 20 May)

[Bug 5492] xs:schema lines too long bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Friday, 16 May)

[Bug 5645] remove spurious ns1 binding from appendix A and reflow line bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Friday, 16 May)

[Bug 5645] remove spurious ns1 binding from appendix A and reflow line bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Friday, 16 May)

[w3c sml][minutes] 2008-05-15 SML Teleconference Smith, Virginia (HP Software) (Friday, 16 May)

[Bug 5522] The term "containing element" is not clear bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 15 May)

[Bug 5528] xs:import for SML namespace is unnecessary bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 15 May)

[Bug 5526] What does "nested to any depth" mean? bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 15 May)

[Bug 5523] Discuss the behavior of GET on URI bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 15 May)

[Bug 5562] SML should define an XHTML href Reference Scheme bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 15 May)

[Bug 5524] Rename section 4.4.1.1 bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 15 May)

[Bug 5545] Reconcile SML URIs with RFC3986 bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 15 May)

[Bug 5524] Rename section 4.4.1.1 bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 15 May)

[Bug 5298] Consider using another term for 'URI scheme' bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 15 May)

[Bug 5529] Clarify Appendix C bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 15 May)

[Bug 5520] Why is document defined as a character sequence? bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 15 May)

[Bug 5513] Why does SML define sml:ref instead of using XLink bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 15 May)

[Bug 5505] wrong type for schemaBinding/namespaceBinding/namespace attribute bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 15 May)

[Bug 5519] Relationship between SML model validity and XSD validity assessment needs to be precisely defined bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 15 May)

[Bug 5283] "interchange set" or "interchange model" bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 15 May)

[Bug 5298] Consider using another term for 'URI scheme' bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 15 May)

RE: [w3c sml][agenda] v2 2008-05-15 SML Telecon Pratul Dublish (Thursday, 15 May)

[Bug 5528] xs:import for SML namespace is unnecessary bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 15 May)

[Bug 5526] What does "nested to any depth" mean? bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 15 May)

[Bug 5525] Confusing section names bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 15 May)

[Bug 5523] Discuss the behavior of GET on URI bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 15 May)

[Bug 5658] restore accidental change to smlif:identityType bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 15 May)

[Bug 5659] schemaComplete default value bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 15 May)

bugs in "surprising" (to me) states John Arwe (Thursday, 15 May)

[Bug 5520] Why is document defined as a character sequence? bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 15 May)

[Bug 5541] Why is schema-less identification of reference elements important? bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 15 May)

[w3c sml][agenda] 2008-05-15 SML Telecon Pratul Dublish (Wednesday, 14 May)

[Bug 5519] Relationship between SML model validity and XSD validity assessment needs to be precisely defined bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 8 May)

[Bug 5541] Why is schema-less identification of reference elements important? bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 8 May)

[Bug 5562] SML should define an XHTML href Reference Scheme bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 8 May)

[Bug 5678] locid is missing from schema in editors draft bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 8 May)

[Bug 5680] fix errors in schematron variable substitution support text & example bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 8 May)

[Bug 5606] Update spec to clarify SML reference resolution bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 8 May)

[Bug 5658] restore accidental change to smlif:identityType bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 8 May)

[Bug 5676] schemaComplete should be allowed only at 1 location bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 8 May)

[Bug 5659] schemaComplete default value bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 8 May)

[Bug 5679] fix disparity between SML & SML-IF specs regarding SML ref targets bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 8 May)

[Bug 5635] impl-defined and impl-dependent used, but not defined bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 8 May)

5679 fix disparity between SML & SML-IF specs regarding SML ref targets Kumar Pandit (Thursday, 8 May)

5676 schemaComplete should be allowed only at 1 location Kumar Pandit (Thursday, 8 May)

5659 schemaComplete default value Kumar Pandit (Thursday, 8 May)

5658 restore accidental change to smlif:identityType Kumar Pandit (Thursday, 8 May)

[Bug 5635] impl-defined and impl-dependent used, but not defined bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 8 May)

[Bug 5606] Update spec to clarify SML reference resolution bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 8 May)

[Bug 5680] fix errors in schematron variable substitution support text & example bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 8 May)

[Bug 5679] fix disparity between SML & SML-IF specs regarding SML ref targets bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Wednesday, 7 May)

[Bug 5678] locid is missing from schema in editors draft bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Wednesday, 7 May)

RE: interoperability is... ? (was: SML interop test plan) John Arwe (Wednesday, 7 May)

regrets for 5/8 and 5/15 Julia McCarthy (Wednesday, 7 May)

[Bug 5678] locid is missing from schema in editors draft bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Wednesday, 7 May)

Re: [w3c sml] [EPR Note] Response to Comment #9, Issue 5431 John Arwe (Monday, 5 May)

[w3c sml][minutes] 2008-05-01 SML Teleconference Jordan Boucher (Monday, 5 May)

RE: SML interop test plan John Arwe (Monday, 5 May)

[Bug 5676] schemaComplete should be allowed only at 1 location bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Saturday, 3 May)

[Bug 5541] Why is schema-less identification of reference elements important? bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 1 May)

[Bug 5283] "interchange set" or "interchange model" bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 1 May)

[Bug 5390] How to handle non-embedded documents referenced by EPRs in SML-IF bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 1 May)

[Bug 5561] SML should define a Simple XLink Reference Scheme bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 1 May)

[Bug 5657] Define implementation-defined and -dependent, use consistently bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 1 May)

[Bug 5656] Defining interoperability for user-defined reference schemes bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 1 May)

[Bug 5653] Final vocabulary clean-up bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 1 May)

[Bug 5519] Relationship between SML model validity and XSD validity assessment needs to be precisely defined bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 1 May)

Re: [w3c sml][agenda][v2] 2008-05-01 SML Telecon C. M. Sperberg-McQueen (Thursday, 1 May)

[Bug 5522] The term "containing element" is not clear bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 1 May)

[Bug 5544] Why does SML require that the target of SMLURI be an XML element? bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 1 May)

[Bug 5522] The term "containing element" is not clear bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org (Thursday, 1 May)

discussion on : 5544 Why does SML require that the target of SMLURI be an XML element? Kumar Pandit (Thursday, 1 May)

support for shorthand (barename) pointers : summary of discussion at f2f Kumar Pandit (Thursday, 1 May)

Last message date: Saturday, 31 May 2008 04:16:08 UTC