- From: Kumar Pandit <kumarp@windows.microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 May 2008 18:45:22 -0700
- To: "public-sml@w3.org" <public-sml@w3.org>
- CC: Kumar Pandit <kumarp@windows.microsoft.com>
Received on Thursday, 8 May 2008 01:51:51 UTC
This was an accidental editorial change. I do not anticipate any disagreement on this one. Please reply to indicate whether you agree with the proposal. >From the bug: ========= Some editor seems to have swapped the position of baseURI and description elements within smlif:identityType. This must be accidental change since I do not recall any WG decision leading to this change. This breaks all existing SML-IF models. Proposal: Change the definition of identityType: from: <xs:complexType name="identityType"> <xs:sequence> ... ... <xs:element name="description" type="smlif:displayType" minOccurs="0"/> <xs:element name="baseURI" type="smlif:uriType" minOccurs="0"/> ... ... </xs:sequence> <xs:anyAttribute namespace="##other" processContents="lax"/> </xs:complexType> to: <xs:complexType name="identityType"> <xs:sequence> ... ... <xs:element name="baseURI" type="smlif:uriType" minOccurs="0"/> <xs:element name="description" type="smlif:displayType" minOccurs="0"/> ... ... </xs:sequence> <xs:anyAttribute namespace="##other" processContents="lax"/> </xs:complexType>
Received on Thursday, 8 May 2008 01:51:51 UTC