- From: <bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 08 May 2008 14:12:44 +0000
- To: public-sml@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5680 ------- Comment #1 from johnarwe@us.ibm.com 2008-05-08 14:12 ------- sigh: baby, bath water [proposal 1] One of the two major *points* of the section was to show xsl:variable for the reasons explained in the text (which asserts that sch:let is NOT equivalent in some interesting scenarios). [proposal 2] ditto Therefore I think neither proposal is appropriate, unless the basic premise that sch:let implicitly refers to a document-structure-specific evaluation context is being challenged. [proposal 3] I think we should fix problems (b) and (c) throughout appendix F; doing so retains the intent and fixes the syntax, which is a good thing. from: <sch:value-of select="string(u:ID)"/> to : <sch:value-of select="string(smlfn:deref(.)/u:ID)"/> ...many occurrences in App F In this sense, I'm taking on faith the bug's assertion that the context= on sch:rule does not govern the sch:value-of... I'm not a Schematron whiz. Certainly, having just re-read the Schematron spec, I agree there is a conflict there (deref in one place, not in the other), but I cannot tell for sure which is correct with confidence. On the surface, "without deref()" sure looks right. [Schematron excerpt] 5.4.14 value-of element Finds or calculates values from the instance document to allow clearer assertions and diagnostics. The required select attribute is an expression evaluated in the current context that returns a string.
Received on Thursday, 8 May 2008 14:13:16 UTC