- From: Jordan Boucher <Jordan.Boucher@Sun.COM>
- Date: Thu, 08 May 2008 12:07:24 -0600
- To: Kumar Pandit <kumarp@windows.microsoft.com>
- Cc: "public-sml@w3.org" <public-sml@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 8 May 2008 18:06:15 UTC
+1 On May 7, 2008, at 7:51 PM, Kumar Pandit wrote: > This seems to be an oversight. I do not anticipate any disagreement > on this one. Please reply to indicate whether you agree with the > proposal. > > From the bug: > ========= > Currently the schemaComplte attribute is defined on the > documentCollectionType > complex type. There are 2 elements defined to be of this type. Namely, > definitions & instances. Thus, it is possible to specify > schemaComplete on the > definitions element (as described in the spec) as well as the > instances element > (not described in the spec). The spec simply says that: > > The schemaComplete attribute is defined on the definitions element > and is used > to ... > > It does not say whether one should ignore schemaComplete on other > elements. > This seems to be an oversight. > > Proposal: > 1. Move schemaComplete from documentCollectionType to modelType. > 2. Update spec text to reflect the above. >
Received on Thursday, 8 May 2008 18:06:15 UTC