Re: 5658 restore accidental change to smlif:identityType

+1

On May 7, 2008, at 7:45 PM, Kumar Pandit wrote:

> This was an accidental editorial change. I do not anticipate any  
> disagreement on this one. Please reply to indicate whether you agree  
> with the proposal.
>
> From the bug:
> =========
>
> Some editor seems to have swapped the position of baseURI and  
> description
> elements within smlif:identityType. This must be accidental change  
> since I do
> not recall any WG decision leading to this change. This breaks all  
> existing
> SML-IF models.
>
> Proposal:
> Change the definition of identityType:
>
> from:
>   <xs:complexType name="identityType">
>     <xs:sequence>
> ... ...
>       <xs:element name="description" type="smlif:displayType"  
> minOccurs="0"/>
>       <xs:element name="baseURI" type="smlif:uriType" minOccurs="0"/>
> ... ...
>     </xs:sequence>
>     <xs:anyAttribute namespace="##other" processContents="lax"/>
>   </xs:complexType>
>
> to:
>   <xs:complexType name="identityType">
>     <xs:sequence>
> ... ...
>       <xs:element name="baseURI" type="smlif:uriType" minOccurs="0"/>
>       <xs:element name="description" type="smlif:displayType"  
> minOccurs="0"/>
> ... ...
>     </xs:sequence>
>     <xs:anyAttribute namespace="##other" processContents="lax"/>
>   </xs:complexType>
>