public-sml@w3.org from June 2008 by author

bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

• [Bug 5519] Relationship between SML model validity and XSD validity assessment needs to be precisely defined (Monday, 30 June)
• [Bug 5542] How are SML URIs absolutized (Wednesday, 25 June)
• [Bug 5546] Reconcile SML-IF with RFC 2557 (Wednesday, 25 June)
• [Bug 5637] inconsistencies in language for rule attachment to schema components (Wednesday, 25 June)
• [Bug 5636] why prohibit rules on local decls/defs described by other specs? (Wednesday, 25 June)
• [Bug 5788] target complete identifiers - distinguish between before-normalization input and after-normalization output (Wednesday, 25 June)
• [Bug 5546] Reconcile SML-IF with RFC 2557 (Wednesday, 25 June)
• [Bug 5546] Reconcile SML-IF with RFC 2557 (Wednesday, 25 June)
• [Bug 5519] Relationship between SML model validity and XSD validity assessment needs to be precisely defined (Wednesday, 25 June)
• [Bug 5519] Relationship between SML model validity and XSD validity assessment needs to be precisely defined (Wednesday, 25 June)
• [Bug 5528] xs:import for SML namespace is unnecessary (Wednesday, 25 June)
• [Bug 5528] xs:import for SML namespace is unnecessary (Wednesday, 25 June)
• [Bug 5526] What does "nested to any depth" mean? (Wednesday, 25 June)
• [Bug 5526] What does "nested to any depth" mean? (Wednesday, 25 June)
• [Bug 5523] Discuss the behavior of GET on URI (Wednesday, 25 June)
• [Bug 5721] Statement about definitions in definition docs vs. instance docs would help (Wednesday, 25 June)
• [Bug 5790] reduce the "all bets are off" consequence of unreachable documents (Wednesday, 25 June)
• [Bug 5788] target complete identifiers - distinguish between before-normalization input and after-normalization output (Wednesday, 25 June)
• [Bug 5788] target complete identifiers - distinguish between before-normalization input and after-normalization output (Wednesday, 25 June)
• [Bug 5721] Statement about definitions in definition docs vs. instance docs would help (Wednesday, 25 June)
• [Bug 5636] why prohibit rules on local decls/defs described by other specs? (Tuesday, 24 June)
• [Bug 5636] why prohibit rules on local decls/defs described by other specs? (Tuesday, 24 June)
• [Bug 5788] target complete identifiers - distinguish between before-normalization input and after-normalization output (Tuesday, 24 June)
• [Bug 5790] reduce the "all bets are off" consequence of unreachable documents (Tuesday, 24 June)
• [Bug 5788] target complete identifiers - distinguish between before-normalization input and after-normalization output (Tuesday, 24 June)
• [Bug 5653] Final vocabulary clean-up (Tuesday, 24 June)
• [Bug 5797] New: SML validity appeal to schema-validity is underspecified (Tuesday, 24 June)
• [Bug 5740] Inconsistent requirements for using PSVI after 5541 adopted (Tuesday, 24 June)
• [Bug 5523] Discuss the behavior of GET on URI (Tuesday, 24 June)
• [Bug 5721] Statement about definitions in definition docs vs. instance docs would help (Tuesday, 24 June)
• [Bug 5520] Why is document defined as a character sequence? (Tuesday, 24 June)
• [Bug 5520] Why is document defined as a character sequence? (Tuesday, 24 June)
• [Bug 5545] Reconcile SML URIs with RFC3986 (Tuesday, 24 June)
• [Bug 5545] Reconcile SML URIs with RFC3986 (Tuesday, 24 June)
• [Bug 5529] Clarify Appendix C (Tuesday, 24 June)
• [Bug 5529] Clarify Appendix C (Tuesday, 24 June)
• [Bug 5513] Why does SML define sml:ref instead of using XLink (Tuesday, 24 June)
• [Bug 5513] Why does SML define sml:ref instead of using XLink (Tuesday, 24 June)
• [Bug 5541] Why is schema-less identification of reference elements important? (Tuesday, 24 June)
• [Bug 5541] Why is schema-less identification of reference elements important? (Tuesday, 24 June)
• [Bug 5522] The term "containing element" is not clear (Tuesday, 24 June)
• [Bug 5522] The term "containing element" is not clear (Tuesday, 24 June)
• [Bug 5790] New: reduce the "all bets are off" consequence of unreachable documents (Tuesday, 24 June)
• [Bug 5657] Define implementation-defined and -dependent, use consistently (Tuesday, 24 June)
• [Bug 5656] Defining interoperability for user-defined reference schemes (Tuesday, 24 June)
• [Bug 5656] Defining interoperability for user-defined reference schemes (Tuesday, 24 June)
• [Bug 5760] definitions and uses of "target" disagree (Tuesday, 24 June)
• [Bug 5707] clarify SML reference resolution when sml:uri value is an empty string (Tuesday, 24 June)
• [Bug 5788] New: target complete identifiers - distinguish between before-normalization input and after-normalization output (Tuesday, 24 June)
• [Bug 5519] Relationship between SML model validity and XSD validity assessment needs to be precisely defined (Monday, 23 June)
• [Bug 5519] Relationship between SML model validity and XSD validity assessment needs to be precisely defined (Monday, 23 June)
• [Bug 5519] Relationship between SML model validity and XSD validity assessment needs to be precisely defined (Monday, 23 June)
• [Bug 5636] why prohibit rules on local decls/defs described by other specs? (Monday, 23 June)
• [Bug 5636] why prohibit rules on local decls/defs described by other specs? (Monday, 23 June)
• [Bug 5636] why prohibit rules on local decls/defs described by other specs? (Monday, 23 June)
• [Bug 5636] why prohibit rules on local decls/defs described by other specs? (Monday, 23 June)
• [Bug 5712] Missing word "global" in schema annotation. (Thursday, 19 June)
• [Bug 5761] Change to rfc 2119 keywords (Thursday, 19 June)
• [Bug 5638] fix consistency of language for schematron constraints (Thursday, 19 June)
• [Bug 5767] Define "SML constraints" (Thursday, 19 June)
• [Bug 5721] Statement about definitions in definition docs vs. instance docs would help (Thursday, 19 June)
• [Bug 5638] fix consistency of language for schematron constraints (Thursday, 19 June)
• [Bug 5721] Statement about definitions in definition docs vs. instance docs would help (Thursday, 19 June)
• [Bug 5720] Inconsistent languge describing sml references and schemes (Thursday, 19 June)
• [Bug 5679] fix disparity between SML & SML-IF specs regarding SML ref targets (Thursday, 19 June)
• [Bug 5761] Change to rfc 2119 keywords (Thursday, 19 June)
• [Bug 5741] 4.3.1 SML URI Reference Scheme item 2 - clarify relationship to rfc 3986 and terminology (Thursday, 19 June)
• [Bug 5715] add definition of the term 'processor' (Thursday, 19 June)
• [Bug 5499] Explanation of notation for { } and [ ] (Thursday, 19 June)
• [Bug 5712] Missing word "global" in schema annotation. (Thursday, 19 June)
• [Bug 5720] Inconsistent languge describing sml references and schemes (Thursday, 19 June)
• [Bug 5710] Sections 4.1.3 and 4.1.1 - mismatch of definitions (Thursday, 19 June)
• [Bug 5499] Explanation of notation for { } and [ ] (Thursday, 19 June)
• [Bug 5499] Explanation of notation for { } and [ ] (Thursday, 19 June)
• [Bug 5721] Statement about definitions in definition docs vs. instance docs would help (Thursday, 19 June)
• [Bug 5499] Explanation of notation for { } and [ ] (Thursday, 19 June)
• [Bug 5720] Inconsistent languge describing sml references and schemes (Thursday, 19 June)
• [Bug 5680] fix errors in schematron variable substitution support text & example (Wednesday, 18 June)
• [Bug 5680] fix errors in schematron variable substitution support text & example (Wednesday, 18 June)
• [Bug 5680] fix errors in schematron variable substitution support text & example (Wednesday, 18 June)
• [Bug 5653] Final vocabulary clean-up (Wednesday, 18 June)
• [Bug 5657] Define implementation-defined and -dependent, use consistently (Wednesday, 18 June)
• [Bug 5740] Inconsistent requirements for using PSVI after 5541 adopted (Wednesday, 18 June)
• [Bug 5499] Explanation of notation for { } and [ ] (Wednesday, 18 June)
• [Bug 5761] Change to rfc 2119 keywords (Wednesday, 18 June)
• [Bug 5541] Why is schema-less identification of reference elements important? (Wednesday, 18 June)
• [Bug 5499] Explanation of notation for { } and [ ] (Wednesday, 18 June)
• [Bug 5499] Explanation of notation for { } and [ ] (Wednesday, 18 June)
• [Bug 5767] New: Define "SML constraints" (Wednesday, 18 June)
• [Bug 5541] Why is schema-less identification of reference elements important? (Wednesday, 18 June)
• [Bug 5598] title of section 4.2.7, deref() XPath Extension Function (Wednesday, 18 June)
• [Bug 5598] title of section 4.2.7, deref() XPath Extension Function (Wednesday, 18 June)
• [Bug 5761] New: Change to rfc 2119 keywords (Monday, 16 June)
• [Bug 5715] add definition of the term 'processor' (Monday, 16 June)
• [Bug 5715] add definition of the term 'processor' (Monday, 16 June)
• [Bug 5760] definitions and uses of "target" disagree (Monday, 16 June)
• [Bug 5760] New: definitions and uses of "target" disagree (Monday, 16 June)
• [Bug 5710] Sections 4.1.3 and 4.1.1 - mismatch of definitions (Monday, 16 June)
• [Bug 5712] Missing word "global" in schema annotation. (Monday, 16 June)
• [Bug 5741] 4.3.1 SML URI Reference Scheme item 2 - clarify relationship to rfc 3986 and terminology (Monday, 16 June)
• [Bug 5720] Inconsistent languge describing sml references and schemes (Monday, 16 June)
• [Bug 5546] Reconcile SML-IF with RFC 2557 (Friday, 13 June)
• [Bug 5546] Reconcile SML-IF with RFC 2557 (Friday, 13 June)
• [Bug 5741] New: 4.3.1 SML URI Reference Scheme item 2 - clarify relationship to rfc 3986 and terminology (Thursday, 12 June)
• [Bug 5740] New: Inconsistent requirements for using PSVI after 5541 adopted (Thursday, 12 June)
• [Bug 5707] clarify SML reference resolution when sml:uri value is an empty string (Thursday, 12 June)
• [Bug 5542] How are SML URIs absolutized (Thursday, 12 June)
• [Bug 5707] clarify SML reference resolution when sml:uri value is an empty string (Thursday, 12 June)
• [Bug 5598] title of section 4.2.7, deref() XPath Extension Function (Thursday, 12 June)
• [Bug 5529] Clarify Appendix C (Thursday, 12 June)
• [Bug 5541] Why is schema-less identification of reference elements important? (Thursday, 12 June)
• [Bug 5522] The term "containing element" is not clear (Thursday, 12 June)
• [Bug 5522] The term "containing element" is not clear (Thursday, 12 June)
• [Bug 5522] The term "containing element" is not clear (Thursday, 12 June)
• [Bug 5721] Statement about definitions in definition docs vs. instance docs would help (Thursday, 12 June)
• [Bug 5598] title of section 4.2.7, deref() XPath Extension Function (Wednesday, 11 June)
• [Bug 5532] The previous-draft links are out of date (Wednesday, 11 June)
• [Bug 5715] add definition of the term 'processor' (Wednesday, 11 June)
• [Bug 5715] add definition of the term 'processor' (Wednesday, 11 June)
• [Bug 5707] clarify SML reference resolution when sml:uri value is an empty string (Thursday, 5 June)

John Arwe

• [w3c sml][minutes] 2008-06-19 SML telecon (Friday, 20 June)
• [w3c sml][agenda] 2008-06-23 to 208-06-25 SML Face to Face (Wednesday, 18 June)
• [w3c sml][agenda] 2008-06-18 SML telecon (Wednesday, 18 June)
• Fw: [w3c sml] not getting bugzilla emails (Monday, 9 June)
• [w3c sml][agenda] 2008-06-05 SML (Tuesday, 3 June)

Kumar Pandit

• 5680 fix errors in schematron variable substitution support text & example (Tuesday, 24 June)
• [w3c sml][minutes] 2008-06-12 SML Teleconference (Monday, 16 June)

olivier Thereaux

• Re: [w3c sml] not getting bugzilla emails (Tuesday, 10 June)

Pratul Dublish

• Your comments on SML LC (Monday, 23 June)
• [w3c sml][agenda] 2008-06-12 SML Telecon (Thursday, 12 June)

Sandy Gao

• [w3c sml] [minutes] 2008-06-05 SML (Monday, 9 June)

Wilson, Kirk D

• Regrets (Thursday, 5 June)
• [w3c sml] [minutes] 2008-05-29 SML (Monday, 2 June)

Last message date: Monday, 30 June 2008 05:11:31 UTC