- From: Kumar Pandit <kumarp@windows.microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 09:02:40 -0700
- To: "public-sml@w3.org" <public-sml@w3.org>
- CC: Kumar Pandit <kumarp@windows.microsoft.com>
Received on Tuesday, 24 June 2008 16:08:54 UTC
We discussed this in the conf call on 6/19. We decided to continue the discussion in email. For reference, we discussed the following on 6/19: The proposed text says that using sch:let is not sufficient if a message is to be reused outside the context of a schematron constraint. However, the text subsequently uses a schematron based example. Further, the example shows a message that uses sch:value-of in it. Such message cannot be used outside the context of schematron. I think it should use a non-schematron example to be consistent with the earlier text.
Received on Tuesday, 24 June 2008 16:08:54 UTC