[Bug 5657] Define implementation-defined and -dependent, use consistently

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5657


John Arwe <johnarwe@us.ibm.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|hasProposal, needsAgreement |editorial




--- Comment #5 from John Arwe <johnarwe@us.ibm.com>  2008-06-24 11:06:57 ---
f2f consensus

item 1 - covered by 5635
item 2 - agree with proposal in this bug, no changes
item 3 - agree with proposal in this bug
item 4 - agree with proposal, change both sections, amended text

from: implementation-dependent and hence outside the scope of this
specification.
to  : implementation-defined.

item 5 - leave as impl-defined

Working group chose to come down on the side of requiring the behavior to be
documented.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

Received on Tuesday, 24 June 2008 11:07:30 UTC