W3C home
Mailing lists
Public
public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org from November 2011
by thread
55 messages
:
Starting
Tuesday, 1 November 2011 14:45:29 UTC,
Ending
Wednesday, 30 November 2011 15:48:57 UTC
Sort by
:
thread
author
date
subject
Mail actions
:
mail a new topic
Help
:
how to use the archives
search the archives
Re: xsd:hexBinary and xsd:base64Binary entailments
Henry Story
(Wednesday, 30 November)
Indirect Graph Identification
James Leigh
(Monday, 28 November)
Re: Indirect Graph Identification
Sandro Hawke
(Tuesday, 29 November)
Re: Indirect Graph Identification
Sandro Hawke
(Tuesday, 29 November)
SPARQL 1.1 - LeftJoin definition
David McNeil
(Wednesday, 23 November)
Re: SPARQL 1.1 - LeftJoin definition
Eric Prud'hommeaux
(Thursday, 24 November)
Re: SPARQL 1.1 - LeftJoin definition
David McNeil
(Monday, 28 November)
Re: SPARQL 1.1 - LeftJoin definition
Eric Prud'hommeaux
(Monday, 28 November)
Re: SPARQL 1.1 - LeftJoin definition
David McNeil
(Monday, 28 November)
Re: SPARQL 1.1 - LeftJoin definition
Eric Prud'hommeaux
(Monday, 28 November)
Re: SPARQL 1.1 - LeftJoin definition
David McNeil
(Monday, 28 November)
Re: SPARQL 1.1 - LeftJoin definition
Eric Prud'hommeaux
(Monday, 28 November)
Re: SPARQL 1.1 - LeftJoin definition
David McNeil
(Monday, 28 November)
sparql 1.1
허홍수
(Friday, 18 November)
Re: sparql 1.1
Axel Polleres
(Friday, 18 November)
SPARQL 1.1 Service Description comment
Toby Inkster
(Wednesday, 16 November)
Re: SPARQL 1.1 Service Description comment
Peter Ansell
(Wednesday, 16 November)
Re: SPARQL 1.1 Service Description comment
Toby Inkster
(Thursday, 17 November)
Re: SPARQL 1.1 Service Description comment
Gregory Williams
(Tuesday, 29 November)
Re: Comments on Graph Store HTTP Protocol (20110512)
Chime Ogbuji
(Wednesday, 16 November)
Re: Implementation details of SPARQL 1.1 Graph Store HTTP Protocol
Chime Ogbuji
(Wednesday, 16 November)
Re: LC Comment on Entailment Regimes: Insufficient Definition of "Entailment Regime"
Birte Glimm
(Thursday, 10 November)
Re: LC Comment: Restriction on Solutions for RDF-Based Entailment Regime
Birte Glimm
(Thursday, 10 November)
Re: Re: LC Comment: Restriction on Solutions for RDF-Based Entailment Regime
Michael Schneider
(Friday, 18 November)
Re: LC Comment on Entailment Regimes: D-Entailment Datatype Map
Birte Glimm
(Thursday, 10 November)
Re: Re: LC Comment on Entailment Regimes: D-Entailment Datatype Map
Michael Schneider
(Friday, 18 November)
Re: LC Comment on Entailment Regimes: Treatment of Semantic Inconsistency
Birte Glimm
(Thursday, 10 November)
Re: LC Comment on Entailment Regimes: Illegal Handling, specifically OWL 2 Direct Regime
Birte Glimm
(Thursday, 10 November)
Re: LC Comment on Entailment Regimes: Class and Property Variables take DL regime beyond FOL
Birte Glimm
(Thursday, 10 November)
Re: Re: LC Comment on Entailment Regimes: Class and Property Variables take DL regime beyond FOL
Michael Schneider
(Sunday, 20 November)
Re: SPARQL 1.1 Service Description -- Need n3 or RDF/XML
Gregory Williams
(Wednesday, 9 November)
Re: SPARQL 1.1 Service Description -- Need n3 or RDF/XML
David Booth
(Wednesday, 9 November)
Re: Questions concerning 11.7 (Aggregate Example (with errors))
Steve Harris
(Tuesday, 8 November)
Re: Aggregation w/o data?
Steve Harris
(Tuesday, 8 November)
RE: Aggregation w/o data?
Bryan Thompson
(Tuesday, 15 November)
ENCODE_FOR_LOCAL_NAME
David Booth
(Tuesday, 8 November)
Re: error in testcase agg-avg-02
Gregory Williams
(Monday, 7 November)
Re: error in testcase agg-avg-02
Jeen Broekstra
(Monday, 7 November)
When is HAVING processed?
Alex Miller
(Thursday, 3 November)
Re: str() function should also accept blank node argument
Andy Seaborne
(Wednesday, 2 November)
Re: str() function should also accept blank node argument
David Booth
(Wednesday, 2 November)
Re: str() function should also accept blank node argument
Andy Seaborne
(Thursday, 17 November)
Re: str() function should also accept blank node argument
David Booth
(Thursday, 17 November)
Re: Blank Node Ordering
Andy Seaborne
(Wednesday, 2 November)
Re: Blank Node Ordering
James Leigh
(Wednesday, 2 November)
Re: Tests assume distinct output rows are a bad idea
Lee Feigenbaum
(Tuesday, 1 November)
Re: Tests assume distinct output rows are a bad idea
Dave Beckett
(Tuesday, 1 November)
Re: Tests assume distinct output rows are a bad idea
Lee Feigenbaum
(Tuesday, 1 November)
Re: Tests assume distinct output rows are a bad idea
Dave Beckett
(Tuesday, 1 November)
Invitation to connect on LinkedIn
Adrian Walker
(Tuesday, 1 November)
Re: SPARQL Update - Clarifying correct behavior when a graph is created implicitly
Lee Feigenbaum
(Tuesday, 1 November)
Re: SPARQL Update - Clarifying correct behavior when a graph is created implicitly
David Booth
(Tuesday, 1 November)
Re: comments on SPARQL 1.1 Query Last Call WD: builtin functions
Andy Seaborne
(Tuesday, 1 November)
Re: SPARQL 1.1 Service Description - Comments
Gregory Williams
(Tuesday, 1 November)
Re: SPARQL 1.1 Service Description - Comments
David Booth
(Tuesday, 1 November)
Last message date
: Wednesday, 30 November 2011 15:48:57 UTC