public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org from November 2011 by author

Adrian Walker

• Invitation to connect on LinkedIn (Tuesday, 1 November)

Alex Miller

• When is HAVING processed? (Thursday, 3 November)

Andy Seaborne

• Re: str() function should also accept blank node argument (Thursday, 17 November)
• Re: str() function should also accept blank node argument (Wednesday, 2 November)
• Re: Blank Node Ordering (Wednesday, 2 November)
• Re: comments on SPARQL 1.1 Query Last Call WD: builtin functions (Tuesday, 1 November)

Axel Polleres

• Re: sparql 1.1 (Friday, 18 November)

Birte Glimm

• Re: LC Comment on Entailment Regimes: Insufficient Definition of "Entailment Regime" (Thursday, 10 November)
• Re: LC Comment: Restriction on Solutions for RDF-Based Entailment Regime (Thursday, 10 November)
• Re: LC Comment on Entailment Regimes: D-Entailment Datatype Map (Thursday, 10 November)
• Re: LC Comment on Entailment Regimes: Treatment of Semantic Inconsistency (Thursday, 10 November)
• Re: LC Comment on Entailment Regimes: Illegal Handling, specifically OWL 2 Direct Regime (Thursday, 10 November)
• Re: LC Comment on Entailment Regimes: Class and Property Variables take DL regime beyond FOL (Thursday, 10 November)

Bryan Thompson

• RE: Aggregation w/o data? (Tuesday, 15 November)

Chime Ogbuji

• Re: Comments on Graph Store HTTP Protocol (20110512) (Wednesday, 16 November)
• Re: Implementation details of SPARQL 1.1 Graph Store HTTP Protocol (Wednesday, 16 November)

Dave Beckett

• Re: Tests assume distinct output rows are a bad idea (Tuesday, 1 November)
• Re: Tests assume distinct output rows are a bad idea (Tuesday, 1 November)

David Booth

• Re: str() function should also accept blank node argument (Thursday, 17 November)
• Re: SPARQL 1.1 Service Description -- Need n3 or RDF/XML (Wednesday, 9 November)
• ENCODE_FOR_LOCAL_NAME (Tuesday, 8 November)
• Re: str() function should also accept blank node argument (Wednesday, 2 November)
• Re: SPARQL 1.1 Service Description - Comments (Tuesday, 1 November)
• Re: SPARQL Update - Clarifying correct behavior when a graph is created implicitly (Tuesday, 1 November)

David McNeil

• Re: SPARQL 1.1 - LeftJoin definition (Monday, 28 November)
• Re: SPARQL 1.1 - LeftJoin definition (Monday, 28 November)
• Re: SPARQL 1.1 - LeftJoin definition (Monday, 28 November)
• Re: SPARQL 1.1 - LeftJoin definition (Monday, 28 November)
• SPARQL 1.1 - LeftJoin definition (Wednesday, 23 November)

Eric Prud'hommeaux

• Re: SPARQL 1.1 - LeftJoin definition (Monday, 28 November)
• Re: SPARQL 1.1 - LeftJoin definition (Monday, 28 November)
• Re: SPARQL 1.1 - LeftJoin definition (Monday, 28 November)
• Re: SPARQL 1.1 - LeftJoin definition (Thursday, 24 November)

Gregory Williams

• Re: SPARQL 1.1 Service Description comment (Tuesday, 29 November)
• Re: SPARQL 1.1 Service Description -- Need n3 or RDF/XML (Wednesday, 9 November)
• Re: error in testcase agg-avg-02 (Monday, 7 November)
• Re: SPARQL 1.1 Service Description - Comments (Tuesday, 1 November)

Henry Story

• Re: xsd:hexBinary and xsd:base64Binary entailments (Wednesday, 30 November)

James Leigh

• Indirect Graph Identification (Monday, 28 November)
• Re: Blank Node Ordering (Wednesday, 2 November)

Jeen Broekstra

• Re: error in testcase agg-avg-02 (Monday, 7 November)

Lee Feigenbaum

• Re: Tests assume distinct output rows are a bad idea (Tuesday, 1 November)
• Re: SPARQL Update - Clarifying correct behavior when a graph is created implicitly (Tuesday, 1 November)
• Re: Tests assume distinct output rows are a bad idea (Tuesday, 1 November)

Michael Schneider

• Re: Re: LC Comment on Entailment Regimes: Class and Property Variables take DL regime beyond FOL (Sunday, 20 November)
• Re: Re: LC Comment on Entailment Regimes: D-Entailment Datatype Map (Friday, 18 November)
• Re: Re: LC Comment: Restriction on Solutions for RDF-Based Entailment Regime (Friday, 18 November)

Peter Ansell

• Re: SPARQL 1.1 Service Description comment (Wednesday, 16 November)

Sandro Hawke

• Re: Indirect Graph Identification (Tuesday, 29 November)
• Re: Indirect Graph Identification (Tuesday, 29 November)

Steve Harris

• Re: Questions concerning 11.7 (Aggregate Example (with errors)) (Tuesday, 8 November)
• Re: Aggregation w/o data? (Tuesday, 8 November)

Toby Inkster

• Re: SPARQL 1.1 Service Description comment (Thursday, 17 November)
• SPARQL 1.1 Service Description comment (Wednesday, 16 November)

허홍수

• sparql 1.1 (Friday, 18 November)

Last message date: Wednesday, 30 November 2011 15:48:57 UTC