- From: Dave Beckett <dave@dajobe.org>
- Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2011 07:58:28 -0700
- To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- CC: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
Nope. My comment was about tests using SHA224 as an example not about SHA224. Please confirm that the tests no longer rely on distinctness of the output triples. Dave On 11/1/11 7:25 AM, Lee Feigenbaum wrote: > Hi Dave, > > The Working Group has recently resolved to remove the SHA224 function from > SPARQL 1.1 Query. As a byproduct of this, the test in question below has > also been removed from the test suite, so I think that the below issue is no > longer relevant. > > If you could reply to the list to acknowledge that this addresses your > comment, we'd appreciate it. > > best, > Lee > On behalf of the SPARQL WG > > On 10/9/2011 1:48 PM, Dave Beckett wrote: >> A lot of the functions/* tests such as sha224-02 got unicode added >> recently which assumes the output result rows are distinct. This broke >> many of my rasqal tests. >> >> This is a bad idea for two reasons >> 1) you should not make this assumption >> 2) it does not distinguish the state of the two tests in the file - the \u >> form or the unicode form. If something broke, you couldn't tell since >> only 1 result is expected >> >> so instead of: >> :s8 :str "\u98DF", "食" . >> >> use >> :s8 :str "\u98DF" . >> :s9 :str "食" . >> >> and adjust the output results to suit >> >> Thanks >> >> Dave >> >> >> >
Received on Tuesday, 1 November 2011 14:59:04 UTC