Re: SPARQL 1.1 - LeftJoin definition

Eric - Thanks for the responses, that is helpful. I have another comment
below.

On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org> wrote:

> > 4) Given that definition, can't the Filter be pushed down below the
> > LeftJoin? In this way LeftJoin could be simplified because it would no
> > longer need to take an expression.
>
> If I understand, that would remove compatible rows with failed
> filters, as opposed to retaining the row on the left side of the
> optional.
>

The way I am thinking of  it since it is a LeftJoin, the compatible rows
with failed filters would be removed from the right side, but since it is a
LeftJoin, the rows on the left would be retained (since that is what a
LeftJoin does).

-David