public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org from April 2005 by date

Saturday, 23 April 2005

• SPARQL itself represented in RDF instead of DML Gustavo Frederico

Friday, 22 April 2005

• ANN: New working draft: SPARQL Query Language for RDF Seaborne, Andy

Thursday, 21 April 2005

• Limit option suggestion Peter Wilson

Wednesday, 20 April 2005

• User defined operations and PREMISES keyword Stephane Fellah

Friday, 15 April 2005

• Re: replies on named graphs? containers use case Giovanni Tummarello
• Re: replies on named graphs? containers use case Arjohn Kampman
• Re: replies on named graphs? containers use case Dan Connolly

Thursday, 14 April 2005

• Re: Named- and background graphs, triples vs quads, trust, etc. Dan Connolly
• Re: replies on named graphs? containers use case Giovanni Tummarello
• Re: replies on named graphs? containers use case Bob MacGregor
• replies on named graphs? containers use case Giovanni Tummarello

Tuesday, 12 April 2005

• Re: From and With Dan Connolly
• Re: Some possible enhancements Dan Connolly

Monday, 11 April 2005

• Re: Comments on SPARQL 17-Feb-2005 draft (DESCRIBE) Graham Klyne
• Re: Comments on SPARQL 17-Feb-2005 draft (SOURCE, Multiple-graph queries) Graham Klyne
• Some possible enhancements Peter Wilson
• NumericalLogical syntax seems strange Graham Klyne

Saturday, 9 April 2005

• From and With Peter Wilson

Friday, 8 April 2005

• Re: More on WITH and FROM clauses (fromUnionQuery) Dan Connolly
• Re: Comments on SPARQL 17-Feb-2005 draft (valueTesting, serviceDescription) Dan Connolly
• Re: Comments on SPARQL 17-Feb-2005 draft (DESCRIBE) Dan Connolly
• Re: Comments on SPARQL 17-Feb-2005 draft (SOURCE, Multiple-graph queries) Dan Connolly
• More on WITH and FROM clauses Graham Klyne
• Reification shorthand (please drop it) Graham Klyne
• Re: WHERE clause optional? Dave Beckett
• Re: WHERE clause optional? Graham Klyne
• Re: WHERE clause optional? Dave Beckett
• LIMIT clause in right place? Graham Klyne
• WHERE clause optional? Graham Klyne
• More comments about CONSTRUCT Graham Klyne
• CONSTRUCT *, optionals and alternatives Graham Klyne
• Comments on SPARQL 17-Feb-2005 draft Graham Klyne

Thursday, 7 April 2005

• Re: Comment on SPARQL query language spec (punctuationSyntax) Dan Connolly
• Re: SPARQL: which features now, which features later for RDF Data Access? Dan Connolly

Wednesday, 6 April 2005

• Comment on SPARQL query language spec (nit) Graham Klyne

Tuesday, 5 April 2005

• SPARQL query by reference in HTTP GET Graham Klyne
• Re: SPARQL: which features now, which features later for RDF Data Access? Adrian Walker

Monday, 4 April 2005

• Re: SPARQL: which features now, which features later for RDF Data Access? Patrick Stickler
• Re: SPARQL: which features now, which features later for RDF Data Access? Dan Connolly
• Re: SPARQL: which features now, which features later for RDF Data Access? Patrick Stickler

Saturday, 2 April 2005

• RE: Comments on pattern solution definition Geoff Chappell
• Comments on pattern solution definition Geoff Chappell

Last message date: Saturday, 23 April 2005 13:43:54 UTC