- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 09:31:30 -0500
- To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org, Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>
> I'm working on a SPARQL implementation, based on: > http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-rdf-sparql-query-20050217/ > and offer some comments: [...] > I note the punctuation decision referenced: > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ftf4.html#item18 > and offer an opinion that I would prefer the N3/Turtle approach, partly on > the basis that I already have code to deal with these structures. In fact, the WG has reconsidered that decision since the 17 Feb publication. I hope we'll have an updated WD in the next 2 to three weeks. Meanwhile, you're welcome to peek into the WG proceedings. The relevant issue is... http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#punctuationSyntax -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Thursday, 7 April 2005 14:31:31 UTC