public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org from April 2005 by author

Adrian Walker

• Re: SPARQL: which features now, which features later for RDF Data Access? (Tuesday, 5 April)

Arjohn Kampman

• Re: replies on named graphs? containers use case (Friday, 15 April)

Bob MacGregor

• Re: replies on named graphs? containers use case (Thursday, 14 April)

Dan Connolly

• Re: replies on named graphs? containers use case (Friday, 15 April)
• Re: Named- and background graphs, triples vs quads, trust, etc. (Thursday, 14 April)
• Re: From and With (Tuesday, 12 April)
• Re: Some possible enhancements (Tuesday, 12 April)
• Re: More on WITH and FROM clauses (fromUnionQuery) (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: Comments on SPARQL 17-Feb-2005 draft (valueTesting, serviceDescription) (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: Comments on SPARQL 17-Feb-2005 draft (DESCRIBE) (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: Comments on SPARQL 17-Feb-2005 draft (SOURCE, Multiple-graph queries) (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: Comment on SPARQL query language spec (punctuationSyntax) (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: SPARQL: which features now, which features later for RDF Data Access? (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: SPARQL: which features now, which features later for RDF Data Access? (Monday, 4 April)

Dave Beckett

• Re: WHERE clause optional? (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: WHERE clause optional? (Friday, 8 April)

Geoff Chappell

• RE: Comments on pattern solution definition (Saturday, 2 April)
• Comments on pattern solution definition (Saturday, 2 April)

Giovanni Tummarello

• Re: replies on named graphs? containers use case (Friday, 15 April)
• Re: replies on named graphs? containers use case (Thursday, 14 April)
• replies on named graphs? containers use case (Thursday, 14 April)

Graham Klyne

• Re: Comments on SPARQL 17-Feb-2005 draft (DESCRIBE) (Monday, 11 April)
• Re: Comments on SPARQL 17-Feb-2005 draft (SOURCE, Multiple-graph queries) (Monday, 11 April)
• NumericalLogical syntax seems strange (Monday, 11 April)
• More on WITH and FROM clauses (Friday, 8 April)
• Reification shorthand (please drop it) (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: WHERE clause optional? (Friday, 8 April)
• LIMIT clause in right place? (Friday, 8 April)
• WHERE clause optional? (Friday, 8 April)
• More comments about CONSTRUCT (Friday, 8 April)
• CONSTRUCT *, optionals and alternatives (Friday, 8 April)
• Comments on SPARQL 17-Feb-2005 draft (Friday, 8 April)
• Comment on SPARQL query language spec (nit) (Wednesday, 6 April)
• SPARQL query by reference in HTTP GET (Tuesday, 5 April)

Gustavo Frederico

• SPARQL itself represented in RDF instead of DML (Saturday, 23 April)

Patrick Stickler

• Re: SPARQL: which features now, which features later for RDF Data Access? (Monday, 4 April)
• Re: SPARQL: which features now, which features later for RDF Data Access? (Monday, 4 April)

Peter Wilson

• Limit option suggestion (Thursday, 21 April)
• Some possible enhancements (Monday, 11 April)
• From and With (Saturday, 9 April)

Seaborne, Andy

• ANN: New working draft: SPARQL Query Language for RDF (Friday, 22 April)

Stephane Fellah

• User defined operations and PREMISES keyword (Wednesday, 20 April)

Last message date: Saturday, 23 April 2005 13:43:54 UTC