- From: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 08:31:01 +0100
- To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
[Offline, so no refs, sorry] w.r.t. SPARQL draft 17Feb2005 The syntax in productions [39] [40] seems odd to me. In particular, it allows expressions like: i < j == k < l which might theoretically be an equality comparison of Boolean values, but I'm not seeing any built-in operator for that. I think these should possibly be a single production like: NumericalLogical ::= NumericExpression ( '==' NumericExpression | '!=' NumericExpression | '<' NumericExpression | '>' NumericExpression | '<=' NumericExpression | '>=' NumericExpression )? ... While I'm commenting on the grammar, I notice there seem to be rather a lot of dead productions (or synonyms), some of which are possibly confusing (e.g. [34] ConditionalXorExpression). I can see one might want to have the extra productions in an implementation, but I think the specification would be better servedx by eliminating the redundant productions. #g ------------ Graham Klyne For email: http://www.ninebynine.org/#Contact
Received on Monday, 11 April 2005 15:03:25 UTC