Thursday, 30 June 2016
Wednesday, 29 June 2016
- FTF meeting attendance is full
- Re: Updated Web Payments Architecture Summary
- RE: Review ready Core Messages and HTTP API specs
- Review ready Core Messages and HTTP API specs
- Re: Updated Web Payments Architecture Summary
Tuesday, 28 June 2016
Monday, 27 June 2016
Saturday, 25 June 2016
Friday, 24 June 2016
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] Include the IG terminology document (#149)
- [w3c/webpayments] Include the IG terminology document (#149)
Thursday, 23 June 2016
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] Api shape and payment options (#148)
- [Minutes] Web Payments WG meeting 2016-06-23
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] Api shape and payment options (#148)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] Api shape and payment options (#148)
- Re: AGENDA
- Re: AGENDA
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] Update conformance (#147)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] Update conformance (#147)
- AGENDA
Wednesday, 22 June 2016
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] Registration: How is registration information updated? (#111)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] Registration: How is registration information updated? (#111)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] Registration: How is registration information updated? (#111)
- [w3c/webpayments] Api shape and payment options (#148)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] Update conformance (#147)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] Update conformance (#147)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] Update conformance (#147)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] Update conformance (#147)
- [w3c/webpayments] Update conformance (#147)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] Adding issues to payment app specification (#146)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] Adding issues to payment app specification (#146)
- [w3c/webpayments] Adding issues to payment app specification (#146)
- Re: [WICG/paymentrequest] Web Payments WG relation to this repo (#71)
- Re: [WICG/paymentrequest] Web Payments WG relation to this repo (#71)
- Re: [WICG/paymentrequest] Web Payments WG relation to this repo (#71)
- Re: [WICG/paymentrequest] Web Payments WG relation to this repo (#71)
- Re: [WICG/historical-web-payments-browser-api] Status update (#8)
- Re: [WICG/paymentrequest] Web Payments WG relation to this repo (#71)
- Re: New Web Payments Architecture document proposal
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] Registration: How is registration information updated? (#111)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] Moved notes and issues into markers to distinguish from spec text (#145)
- Re: New Web Payments Architecture document proposal
Tuesday, 21 June 2016
- [w3c/webpayments] Moved notes and issues into markers to distinguish from spec text (#145)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] How should third-party payment apps be displayed by the browser? (#143)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] How should third-party payment apps be displayed by the browser? (#143)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] How should third-party payment apps be displayed by the browser? (#143)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] How should third-party payment apps be displayed by the browser? (#143)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] Use notes and issues more consistently (#144)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] Use notes and issues more consistently (#144)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] How should third-party payment apps be displayed by the browser? (#143)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] Registration: Should payment instrument details be included? (#142)
- [w3c/webpayments] Use notes and issues more consistently (#144)
- [w3c/webpayments] How should third-party payment apps be displayed by the browser? (#143)
- [w3c/webpayments] Registration: Should payment instrument details be included? (#142)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] Registration: How is registration information updated? (#111)
- Help Required on Issues
- Reminder - Interledger Workshop - 6 July - London
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] What happens if there’s a failure before the payment response promise resolves? (#141)
Monday, 20 June 2016
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] More info about UX around app recommendation and selection; network failures (#140)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] More info about UX around app recommendation and selection; network failures (#140)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] Choosing between javascript and http communication. (#131)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] Choosing between javascript and http communication. (#131)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] More info about UX around app recommendation and selection; network failures (#140)
- [w3c/webpayments] What happens if there’s a failure before the payment response promise resolves? (#141)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] More info about UX around app recommendation and selection (#140)
- [w3c/webpayments] More info about UX around app recommendation and selection (#140)
- Re: [WICG/paymentrequest] Web Payments WG relation to this repo (#71)
- [WICG/web-payments-browser-api] Status update (#8)
- Re: [WICG/paymentrequest] Web Payments WG relation to this repo (#71)
- Re: [WICG/web-payments-browser-api] Web Payments WG relation to this repo (#7)
- Re: [WICG/paymentrequest] Web Payments WG relation to this repo (#71)
- [WICG/paymentrequest] Web Payments WG relation to this repo (#71)
- [WICG/web-payments-browser-api] Web Payments WG relation to this repo (#7)
- Re: Call for reviews of HTTP API and Core Messages proposals
- Re: comments on web payment HTTP API and core message components
- Re: comments on web payment HTTP API and core message components
Saturday, 18 June 2016
- Re: New Web Payments Architecture document proposal
- Re: comments on web payment HTTP API and core message components
- Re: comments on web payment HTTP API and core message components
Friday, 17 June 2016
Thursday, 16 June 2016
- [Minutes] 16 June WPWG teleconference
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] Registration: Should we support payee knowing user has payee-controlled payment app? (#112)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] Registration: Should we support payee knowing user has payee-controlled payment app? (#112)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] Editorial changes for more context (#139)
- [w3c/webpayments] Editorial changes for more context (#139)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] Editorial changes for more context (#139)
Wednesday, 15 June 2016
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] Gh pages (#138)
- [w3c/webpayments] Gh pages (#138)
- Agenda
- [w3c/webpayments] Should the browser pass user data it has collected (email etc) to the payment app? (#137)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] Some edits on @ianbjacobs refactoring (#136)
- [w3c/webpayments] Some edits on @ianbjacobs refactoring (#136)
Tuesday, 14 June 2016
Monday, 13 June 2016
Friday, 10 June 2016
Thursday, 9 June 2016
Wednesday, 8 June 2016
Monday, 6 June 2016
Thursday, 2 June 2016
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] Terminology across all Web Payments documents should be aligned (#135)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] Terminology across all Web Payments documents should be aligned (#135)
Wednesday, 1 June 2016
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] Terminology across all Web Payments documents should be aligned (#135)
- AGENDA - 2 June
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] Terminology across all Web Payments documents should be aligned (#135)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] Clarify the concepts of enabled vs. supported (#132)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] Clarify the concepts of enabled vs. supported (#132)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] PROPOSAL: A new document structure for this API (#134)
- Re: [w3c/webpayments] PROPOSAL: A new document structure for this API (#134)