W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org > May 2013

Re: [ISSUE-55][ACTION-510] Make LQI and LQR similar to mtConfidence in structure.

From: Phil Ritchie <philr@vistatec.ie>
Date: Sun, 12 May 2013 14:06:35 +0100
To: Dave Lewis <dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie>
Cc: "public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org" <public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org>, kevin@spartanconsultinginc.com, chase@spartanconsultinginc.com
Message-ID: <OF2E6D32A7.9335F092-ON80257B69.00412B7B-80257B69.0048037A@vistatec.ie>

I am just catching up on the discussion that happened on day 1 of the Bled 
f2f which I was not present for using the minutes at 

Our current implementation uses XLIFF 1.2. I attach a current sample file 
we are using for testing and demonstrations.

To date all of our use cases are served by using standoff markup per the 

I cannot see anything in the discussion or updated mapping at 
http://www.w3.org/International/its/wiki/XLIFF_Mapping which would affect 
our implementation.

In relation to the question posed about LQR: Can you re-phrase the 
question. Are you asking if it is required at an inline level?


From:   Dave Lewis <dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie>
To:     "public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org" 
Date:   11/05/2013 22:28
Subject:        [ISSUE-55][ACTION-510] Make LQI and LQR similar to 
mtConfidence in  structure.

Hi all,
I have updated the XLIFF 1.2 mappings for data cateogies LQI and LQR as 
per f2f discussions in Bled:

Yves, David, can you check through this.

One question I have a question about LQR: is it compatible with inline 
mark-up as it is defined in the ITS spec as used to "is used to express an 
overall measurement of the localization quality of a document or an item 
in a document."? Any thoughts on that?

VistaTEC Ltd. Registered in Ireland 268483. 
Registered Office, VistaTEC House, 700, South Circular Road, 
Kilmainham. Dublin 8. Ireland. 

The information contained in this message, including any accompanying 
documents, is confidential and is intended only for the addressee(s). 
The unauthorized use, disclosure, copying, or alteration of this 
message is strictly forbidden. If you have received this message in
error please notify the sender immediately.

Received on Sunday, 12 May 2013 13:07:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:32:09 UTC