- From: Mārcis Pinnis <marcis.pinnis@Tilde.lv>
- Date: Sun, 12 May 2013 17:35:02 +0300
- To: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>
- CC: "public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org" <public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org>, Pēteris Ņikiforovs <peteris.nikiforovs@Tilde.lv>, Artūrs Vasiļevskis <arturs.vasilevskis@Tilde.lv>
Hi Yves, Thanks for noticing ... I registered the bug and we will sort it out. However, there are multiple options on how to approach the issue (actually - 3 options as I see it): 1) We overwrite the existing annotatorsRef. This may not be good as not all mark-up will be provided by the last annotator. 2) We add the annotatorsRef in such cases to each element that is annotated with term="yes". This will create a heavy document with a lot of mark-up that could be avoided. 3) We add the annotatorsRef just to the elements that are nearest to the document's root element and below which there is no existing mark-up and below which there is at least one element annotated with term="yes". I would prefer the last, however, in the case if there is a lot of existing mark-up this will look very similar to the 2nd option. What would you (others) prefer? Best regards, Mārcis ;o) -----Original Message----- From: Yves Savourel [mailto:ysavourel@enlaso.com] Sent: Sunday, May 12, 2013 3:48 PM To: Mārcis Pinnis Cc: public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org Subject: Small issue with TAWS Hi Mārcis, all, Just one small issue that I noticed with Tilde's nice Web service: When I submit an HTML document with some existing ITS markup for Terminology, the its-annotators-ref attribute has duplicated values on output. for example if I submit a document with: <body its-annotators-ref="terminology|T1"> I get in output: <body its-annotators-ref="terminology|T1 terminology|http://tilde.com/term-annotation-service"> Looking at the latest editor's draft (http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html#its-tool-annotation) I don't think we explicitly state that only one occurrence of each data categories can be specified per annotatorsRef attribute, so I'm not 100% sure we cannot have two occurrences of terminology, but so far I was interpreting that we were to use only one occurrence. Thoughts? cheers, -ys
Received on Sunday, 12 May 2013 14:35:33 UTC