W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > May 2013

Re: using strong to indicate a title?

From: Christopher Healey <deezignink@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 22:02:21 +0800
Cc: public-html@w3.org
Message-Id: <AD9E0A9B-1844-45C7-BCEB-F52B8B92DF37@gmail.com>
To: Mallory van Achterberg <stommepoes@stommepoes.nl>, Ian Devlin <ian@iandevlin.com>
hgroup was perfect for just this circumstance.

-Christopher


On May 7, 2013, at 9:58 PM, Mallory van Achterberg <stommepoes@stommepoes.nl> wrote:

> On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 09:52:09AM -0400, Denis Boudreau wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> I do like Steve's proposal using an existing element in h1 to create some sort of a hierarchy. But I must admit that the first thing that came to mind when reading Steve's proposal for <strong>, I wondered why the proposal wasn't for <small>. So depending on whether you want the smaller heading above or below the larger one, we could do either of the following: 
>> 
>> <h1>
>> <small>Breaking News</small>
>> Steve Faulkner had this crazy idea!
>> </h1>
>> 
>> <h1>
>> Breaking News
>> <small>Steve Faulkner had this crazy idea!</small>
>> </h1>
>> 
>> /Denis
>> 
> 
> Of the two, I like the second one better. Small has always meant
> "sub" in my mind, read out loud differently like legal text and
> under-the-breath mutters. First example makes much less sense, since
> if you just want a styling sandbag, span makes more sense.
> 
> -Mallory
> 
Received on Tuesday, 7 May 2013 14:02:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:46:02 UTC