- From: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 15:02:58 +0100
- To: Ian Devlin <ian@iandevlin.com>
- Cc: Denis Boudreau <dboudreau@accessibiliteweb.com>, Wilfred Nas <wilfrednas@gmail.com>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+ri+VkA3sNxhG0BBU=7cMGfjv40NW-DJx3Z9BYAhGkoQBrL0g@mail.gmail.com>
It should be noted that we discussed small (last month) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2013Apr/thread.html#msg22 so it may be worth reading there and responding to that thread -- Regards SteveF HTML 5.1 <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/> On 7 May 2013 15:00, Ian Devlin <ian@iandevlin.com> wrote: > I would prefer using attributes to specifically add the relation you want > rather than it being implied. > > I don't like the use of <small> as its current definition is to represent > "side comments" which a subtitle would not be (it's more important than > that). I know that we can of course change the meaning of the element in > the specification, but as Mallory says for <strong>, this would mean > changing the meaning of this element again. > > > On 7 May 2013 15:52, Denis Boudreau <dboudreau@accessibiliteweb.com>wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I do like Steve's proposal using an existing element in h1 to create some >> sort of a hierarchy. But I must admit that the first thing that came to >> mind when reading Steve's proposal for <strong>, I wondered why the >> proposal wasn't for <small>. So depending on whether you want the smaller >> heading above or below the larger one, we could do either of the following: >> >> <h1> >> <small>Breaking News</small> >> Steve Faulkner had this crazy idea! >> </h1> >> >> <h1> >> Breaking News >> <small>Steve Faulkner had this crazy idea!</small> >> </h1> >> >> /Denis >> >> >> >> On 2013-05-07, at 9:38 AM, Wilfred Nas <wilfrednas@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Why not small for the subtitle part? >> >> <h1>title >> <small>subtitle</small> >> </h1> >> >> Cheers >> >> Wilfred Nas >> >> On 7 mei 2013, at 15:26, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> disclaimer: its an off the cuff idea only! >> >> I have been musing on the idea of using strong to signify the title part >> of a heading that has title and subtitle: >> >> <h1><strong>title</strong> subtitle</h1> >> >> would be interested to get others thoughts on the pattern >> >> >> -- >> >> Regards >> >> SteveF >> HTML 5.1 <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/> >> >> >> >
Received on Tuesday, 7 May 2013 14:04:07 UTC