Re: using strong to indicate a title?

well no it wasn't which is why it was binned.

the circumstance is where you have a title/subtitle that you want to
include in the 'outline' but the subtitle does not start a new
section/subsection

--

Regards

SteveF
HTML 5.1 <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/>


On 7 May 2013 15:02, Christopher Healey <deezignink@gmail.com> wrote:

> hgroup was perfect for just this circumstance.
>
> -Christopher
>
>
> On May 7, 2013, at 9:58 PM, Mallory van Achterberg <
> stommepoes@stommepoes.nl> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 09:52:09AM -0400, Denis Boudreau wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I do like Steve's proposal using an existing element in h1 to create
> some sort of a hierarchy. But I must admit that the first thing that came
> to mind when reading Steve's proposal for <strong>, I wondered why the
> proposal wasn't for <small>. So depending on whether you want the smaller
> heading above or below the larger one, we could do either of the following:
> >>
> >> <h1>
> >> <small>Breaking News</small>
> >> Steve Faulkner had this crazy idea!
> >> </h1>
> >>
> >> <h1>
> >> Breaking News
> >> <small>Steve Faulkner had this crazy idea!</small>
> >> </h1>
> >>
> >> /Denis
> >>
> >
> > Of the two, I like the second one better. Small has always meant
> > "sub" in my mind, read out loud differently like legal text and
> > under-the-breath mutters. First example makes much less sense, since
> > if you just want a styling sandbag, span makes more sense.
> >
> > -Mallory
> >
>
>
>