W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > May 2013

Re: using strong to indicate a title?

From: Wilfred Nas <wilfred@wnas.nl>
Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 16:17:08 +0200
Cc: public-html@w3.org
Message-Id: <176630A7-7BA5-44B3-8584-B25A74E1275E@wnas.nl>
To: Christopher Healey <deezignink@gmail.com>
hear hear.

Cheers,

Wilfred Nas

@wnas
wilfred@wnas.nl
wnas.nl
+31(0)6 2426 9159

On May 7, 2013, at 4:02 PM, Christopher Healey <deezignink@gmail.com> wrote:

> hgroup was perfect for just this circumstance.
> 
> -Christopher
> 
> 
> On May 7, 2013, at 9:58 PM, Mallory van Achterberg <stommepoes@stommepoes.nl> wrote:
> 
>> On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 09:52:09AM -0400, Denis Boudreau wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>> 
>>> I do like Steve's proposal using an existing element in h1 to create some sort of a hierarchy. But I must admit that the first thing that came to mind when reading Steve's proposal for <strong>, I wondered why the proposal wasn't for <small>. So depending on whether you want the smaller heading above or below the larger one, we could do either of the following: 
>>> 
>>> <h1>
>>> <small>Breaking News</small>
>>> Steve Faulkner had this crazy idea!
>>> </h1>
>>> 
>>> <h1>
>>> Breaking News
>>> <small>Steve Faulkner had this crazy idea!</small>
>>> </h1>
>>> 
>>> /Denis
>>> 
>> 
>> Of the two, I like the second one better. Small has always meant
>> "sub" in my mind, read out loud differently like legal text and
>> under-the-breath mutters. First example makes much less sense, since
>> if you just want a styling sandbag, span makes more sense.
>> 
>> -Mallory
>> 
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 7 May 2013 14:17:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:46:02 UTC