Re: using strong to indicate a title?

I would prefer using attributes to specifically add the relation you want
rather than it being implied.

I don't like the use of <small> as its current definition is to represent
"side comments" which a subtitle would not be (it's more important than
that). I know that we can of course change the meaning of the element in
the specification, but as Mallory says for <strong>, this would mean
changing the meaning of this element again.

On 7 May 2013 15:52, Denis Boudreau <dboudreau@accessibiliteweb.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I do like Steve's proposal using an existing element in h1 to create some
> sort of a hierarchy. But I must admit that the first thing that came to
> mind when reading Steve's proposal for <strong>, I wondered why the
> proposal wasn't for <small>. So depending on whether you want the smaller
> heading above or below the larger one, we could do either of the following:
>
> <h1>
> <small>Breaking News</small>
> Steve Faulkner had this crazy idea!
> </h1>
>
> <h1>
> Breaking News
> <small>Steve Faulkner had this crazy idea!</small>
> </h1>
>
> /Denis
>
>
>
> On 2013-05-07, at 9:38 AM, Wilfred Nas <wilfrednas@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Why not small for the subtitle part?
>
> <h1>title
> <small>subtitle</small>
> </h1>
>
> Cheers
>
> Wilfred Nas
>
> On 7 mei 2013, at 15:26, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> disclaimer: its an off the cuff idea only!
>
> I have been musing on the idea of using strong to signify  the title part
> of a heading that has title and subtitle:
>
> <h1><strong>title</strong> subtitle</h1>
>
> would be interested to get others thoughts on the pattern
>
>
> --
>
> Regards
>
> SteveF
> HTML 5.1 <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/>
>
>
>