- From: Mallory van Achterberg <stommepoes@stommepoes.nl>
- Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 15:58:27 +0200
- To: public-html@w3.org
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 09:52:09AM -0400, Denis Boudreau wrote: > Hi all, > > I do like Steve's proposal using an existing element in h1 to create some sort of a hierarchy. But I must admit that the first thing that came to mind when reading Steve's proposal for <strong>, I wondered why the proposal wasn't for <small>. So depending on whether you want the smaller heading above or below the larger one, we could do either of the following: > > <h1> > <small>Breaking News</small> > Steve Faulkner had this crazy idea! > </h1> > > <h1> > Breaking News > <small>Steve Faulkner had this crazy idea!</small> > </h1> > > /Denis > Of the two, I like the second one better. Small has always meant "sub" in my mind, read out loud differently like legal text and under-the-breath mutters. First example makes much less sense, since if you just want a styling sandbag, span makes more sense. -Mallory
Received on Tuesday, 7 May 2013 13:59:15 UTC