Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)
- RE: POWDER + GRDDL = POWDER semantics? (Wednesday, 30 January)
- POWDER + GRDDL = POWDER semantics? (Tuesday, 29 January)
- RE: GRDDL and powder (Monday, 28 January)
- RE: POWDER + GRDDL + RDF/XML (Monday, 28 January)
- RE: on test #grddlonrdf (Friday, 25 January)
- RE: GRDDL and powder (Thursday, 24 January)
- RE: Multiple GRDDL results in a single transform??? GRDDL and Named Graphs (Thursday, 24 January)
- RE: on test #grddlonrdf (Thursday, 24 January)
- RE: Multiple GRDDL results in a single transform??? GRDDL and Named Graphs (Thursday, 24 January)
- RE: Multiple GRDDL results in a single transform??? GRDDL and Named Graphs (Tuesday, 22 January)
- RE: Multiple GRDDL results in a single transform??? GRDDL and Named Graphs (Friday, 18 January)
- RE: Multiple GRDDL results in a single transform??? GRDDL and Named Graphs (Friday, 18 January)
- Regrets for today (Wednesday, 16 January)
Clark, John
Dan Connolly
Danny Ayers
Fabien Gandon
Harry Halpin
Jeremy Carroll
- Re: POWDER + GRDDL = POWDER semantics? (Thursday, 31 January)
- POWDER + GRDDL + RDF/XML (Friday, 25 January)
- Re: GRDDL and powder (Friday, 25 January)
- Re: Multiple GRDDL results in a single transform??? GRDDL and Named Graphs (Friday, 25 January)
- Re: on test #grddlonrdf (Friday, 25 January)
- Re: Multiple GRDDL results in a single transform??? GRDDL and Named Graphs (Thursday, 24 January)
- Re: Multiple GRDDL results in a single transform??? GRDDL and Named Graphs (Thursday, 24 January)
- GRDDL and powder (Thursday, 24 January)
- on test #grddlonrdf (Thursday, 24 January)
- Re: Multiple GRDDL results in a single transform??? GRDDL and Named Graphs (Wednesday, 23 January)
- Re: Multiple GRDDL results in a single transform??? GRDDL and Named Graphs (Friday, 18 January)
- Multiple GRDDL results in a single transform??? GRDDL and Named Graphs (Thursday, 17 January)
Phil Archer
Story Henry
Last message date: Thursday, 31 January 2008 06:27:29 UTC