- From: Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) <dbooth@hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 18:13:57 +0000
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>, "public-grddl-wg@w3.org" <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
- CC: Phil Archer <parcher@icra.org>
Just to elaborate a little more on POWDER semantics, my hope is that the GRDDL results would provide the authoritative semantics of a POWDER document, i.e., that there would not be two separate and possibly conflicting specifications of the semantics of a POWDER document (one for POWDER Lite and another for POWDER Full). Is that correct? David Booth, Ph.D. HP Software +1 617 629 8881 office | dbooth@hp.com http://www.hp.com/go/software Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not represent the official views of HP unless explicitly stated otherwise.
Received on Tuesday, 29 January 2008 18:14:49 UTC