- From: Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) <dbooth@hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 17:14:03 +0000
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>, "public-grddl-wg@w3.org" <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
- CC: Phil Archer <parcher@icra.org>
> From: Jeremy Carroll > > [ . . . ] > However, if you were to suggest an erratum, I point out that the tests > are definitely not in error (since it doesn't depend on > #rule_rdfxbase), it's more the comment (which does so depend) that is arguably > in error. I'm confused. Given the input at http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/grddlonrdf.rdf doesn't the XSLT script at http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/foaf2con.xsl only generate one triple? But the output at http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/grddlonrdf-output3.rdf seems to also include the three triples that were directly written in the input document at http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/grddlonrdf.rdf Aren't those three triples produced by #rule_rdfxbase? If not, what rule is producing them in the GRDDL result? David Booth, Ph.D. HP Software +1 617 629 8881 office | dbooth@hp.com http://www.hp.com/go/software Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not represent the official views of HP unless explicitly stated otherwise.
Received on Thursday, 24 January 2008 17:15:37 UTC