W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-wg@w3.org > January 2008

Re: POWDER + GRDDL = POWDER semantics?

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 06:26:48 +0000
Message-ID: <47A16A28.1020700@hpl.hp.com>
To: "Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)" <dbooth@hp.com>
CC: "public-grddl-wg@w3.org" <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>, Phil Archer <parcher@icra.org>

Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) wrote:
> Just to elaborate a little more on POWDER semantics, 
 > my hope is that the GRDDL results would provide the authoritative
 > semantics of a POWDER document, i.e., that there would not be two 
 > and **possibly conflicting** specifications of the semantics of a 
POWDER document
 > (one for POWDER Lite and another for POWDER Full).  Is that correct?

My emphasis.
At least from my point of view, I don't think conflict is or should be 
necessary. Formally they may say different things, but they should not 
conflict in the technical sense of contradict one another.

Received on Thursday, 31 January 2008 06:27:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:52:40 UTC