public-bpwg-comments@w3.org from April to June 2006 by author

Al Gilman

• [MWBP] let's fix WAI linking (Wednesday, 3 May)

Anne van Kesteren

• [mobile-bp] Comment on style sheet tests (Sunday, 21 May)

Charles McCathieNevile

• Re: [IMAGES_SPECIFY_SIZE] - CSS, SVG (Monday, 1 May)
• Re: [MEASURES] - borders, margins? (Monday, 1 May)
• Re: [CONTEXT] not a requirement (Monday, 1 May)
• Re: [TAB_ORDER] - testing (Monday, 1 May)
• Re: [CAPABILTIES] wording suggestion (Monday, 1 May)
• Re: [OBJECTS_OR_SCRIPTS] (Monday, 1 May)
• Re: Missing points in current last call draft (Sunday, 16 April)
• Re: [STRUCTURE] - alternative wording? (Sunday, 16 April)
• Re: [TABLES_LAYOUT] - another machine test (Sunday, 16 April)

dom@w3.org

• Re: Problem with capabilities guideline (5.1.2) (Thursday, 18 May)
• Re: comments: Mobile Web Best Practices 1.0 Introduction - history sensitive (Thursday, 18 May)
• Re: Comments on 12 Apr 2006 MWI BP [Was: Last Call Comments on "Mobile Web Best Practices 1.0" (13 Jan 2006 draft) (Thursday, 18 May)
• Re: comments: Mobile Web Best Practices 1.0 - Future techniques (Thursday, 18 May)
• Re: comments: Mobile Web Best Practices 1.0 - Scope (Thursday, 18 May)
• Re: comments: Mobile Web Best Practices 1.0 - Image Format (Thursday, 18 May)
• Re: [CONTEXT] is unnecessary (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: [MWBP 1.0] i18n comment: Support Unicode (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: [MWBP 1.0] i18n comment: No mention of metacharset (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: [MWBP 1.0] i18n comment: Mention standard messages in a mobile device (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: Collected WAI comments on the Mobile Web Best Practices Last Call (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: ANEC comments on MWBP (Last Call version 1.0 of January 13, 2006) (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: [CAPABILTIES] wording suggestion (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: [MWBP 1.0] i18n comment: Machine test (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: [MWBP 1.0] i18n comment: Line break correction (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: [MWBP 1.0] i18n comment: Resources for translatingcontent (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: [MWBP 1.0] i18n comment: Indicating language changes in links (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: [MWBP 1.0] i18n comment: Input methods (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: [MWBP 1.0] i18n comment: No normative references? (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: [MWBP 1.0] i18n comment: Language declaration (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: [MWBP 1.0] i18n comment: XHTML basic (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: [OBJECTS_OR_SCRIPTS] (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: [MWBP 1.0] i18n comment: References in the text / in thereference list (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: [STRUCTURE] - alternative wording? (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: 5.3.7 background image support (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: [MWBP 1.0] i18n comment: Localization part of usability (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: Comments on the Mobile Web Best Practices 1.0 (W3C Working Draft 13 January 2006) document (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: Missing points in current last call draft (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: Re:Comments on Draft 13 January 2006 (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: [MWBP 1.0] i18n comment: Section 1.6 (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: [MWBP 1.0] i18n comment: HTTP charset reference (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: [IMAGES_SPECIFY_SIZE] - CSS, SVG (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: [MWBP 1.0] i18n comment: Reference to UAProf (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: Comments on Draft 13 January 2006 (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: [MEASURES] - borders, margins? (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: Last Call Comments on "Mobile Web Best Practices 1.0" (13 Jan 2006 draft) (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: [CONTEXT] not a requirement (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: [TAB_ORDER] - testing (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: [MWBP 1.0] i18n comment: Relation between sec. 4.2 andactual best practice statements (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: [TABLES_LAYOUT] - another machine test (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: [MWBP 1.0] i18n comment: Bandwith / cost related toscripts (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: 1.4 delivery context (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: [MWBP 1.0] i18n comment: Developing countries and i18n/l10nrequirements (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: [MWBP 1.0] i18n comment: I18n in the scope of MWBP (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: [Fwd: FW: Nokia comments on MWI BP LC draft] (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: "find out capabilities" best practice works against "One Web" message (Wednesday, 12 April)
• Re: [MWBP 1.0] i18n comment: Working with multiple languages (Wednesday, 12 April)

Dominique Hazael-Massieux

• Re: Comments on 12 Apr 2006 MWI BP [Was: Last Call Comments on "Mobile Web Best Practices 1.0" (13 Jan 2006 draft) (Thursday, 18 May)
• RE: [MWBP 1.0] i18n comment: Support Unicode (Thursday, 18 May)
• Re: [MWBP 1.0] i18n comment: Indicating language changes in links (Thursday, 18 May)
• Re: [MWBP] let's fix WAI linking (Thursday, 18 May)

Felix Sasaki

• Re: [MWBP 1.0] i18n comment: Indicating language changes in links (Saturday, 29 April)

Ian B. Jacobs

• Comments on 12 Apr 2006 MWI BP [Was: Last Call Comments on "Mobile Web Best Practices 1.0" (13 Jan 2006 draft) (Thursday, 20 April)

Karl Dubost

• comments: Mobile Web Best Practices 1.0 - Image Format (Wednesday, 26 April)
• comments: Mobile Web Best Practices 1.0 - Future techniques (Wednesday, 26 April)
• comments: Mobile Web Best Practices 1.0 - Scope (Wednesday, 26 April)
• comments: Mobile Web Best Practices 1.0 Introduction - history sensitive (Wednesday, 26 April)

Richard Ishida

• RE: [MWBP 1.0] i18n comment: Support Unicode (Thursday, 4 May)
• RE: [MWBP 1.0] i18n comment: Working with multiple languages (Thursday, 4 May)

Scheppe, Kai-Dietrich

• RE: Problem with capabilities guideline (5.1.2) (Tuesday, 25 April)

West, Mark Andrew

• Problem with capabilities guideline (5.1.2) (Monday, 24 April)

Last message date: Sunday, 21 May 2006 19:02:04 UTC