Re: comments: Mobile Web Best Practices 1.0 - Image Format

 Dear Karl Dubost ,

The Mobile Web Best Practice Working Group has reviewed the comments you
sent [1] on the Last Call Working Draft [2] of the Mobile Web Best
Practices 1.0 published on 12 Apr 2006 Thank you for having taken the time
to review the document and to send us comments!

This message holds the disposition of the said comments on which the
Working Group has agreed. This disposition has been implemented in the new
version of the document available at:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-mobile-bp-20060518/

Please review it carefully and let us know if you agree with it or not
before 30 May 2006. In case of disagreement, you are requested to provide
a specific solution for or a path to a consensus with the Working Group.
If such a consensus cannot be achieved, you will be given the opportunity
to raise a formal objection which will then be reviewed by the Director
during the transition of this document to the next stage in the W3C
Recommendation Track.

Thanks,

For the Mobile Web Best Practice Working Group,
Philipp Hoschka
Dominique Hazaël-Massieux
W3C Staff Contacts

 1. http://www.w3.org/mid/C9D81923-1790-4865-9183-2B369DBDFC76@w3.org
 2. http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-mobile-bp-20060412/


=====

Your comment on 3.7 Default Delivery Context:


Hi,
This is a QA Review comment for "Mobile Web Best Practices 1.0"
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-mobile-bp-20060412/
Tue, 11 Apr 2006 12:18:21 GMT
Last Call WD

Did you have chosen these formats because it's really supported  
everywhere?
I was wondering about PNG.

[[[
Image Format Support

     JPEG
     GIF 89a (non-interlaced, non-transparent, non-animated).
]]]


Working Group Resolution:
Indeed, an analysis of the devices on the market today shows that GIF is
more widely supported than PNG; in particular, PNG is very poorly
supported in most devices on the Japanese market.

----

Received on Thursday, 18 May 2006 16:01:13 UTC