Re: [MWBP 1.0] i18n comment: Reference to UAProf

[Sorry for the duplicate]

  Dear <fsasaki@w3.org>,

The Mobile Web Best Practice Working Group has reviewed the comments you
sent [1] on the Last Call Working Draft [2] of the Mobile Web Best
Practices 1.0 published on 13 January 2006 Thank you for having taken the
time to review the document and to send us comments!

This message holds the disposition of the said comments on which the
Working Group has agreed. This disposition has been implemented in the new
version of the document available at:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-mobile-bp-20060412/

Please review it carefully and let us know if you agree with it or not
before 3 May 2006. In case of disagreement, you are requested to provide a
specific solution for or a path to a consensus with the Working Group. If
such a consensus cannot be achieved, you will be given the opportunity to
raise a formal objection which will then be reviewed by the Director
during the transition of this document to the next stage in the W3C
Recommendation Track.

Thanks,

For the Mobile Web Best Practice Working Group,
Philipp Hoschka
Dominique Hazaël-Massieux
W3C Staff Contacts

 1. http://www.w3.org/mid/20060222165045.0C18643D1@toro.w3.mag.keio.ac.jp
 2. http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-mobile-bp-20060113/


=====

Your comment on the document as a whole:


Comment from the i18n review of:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-mobile-bp-20060113/

Comment 15
At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0602-mwbp10/
Editorial/substantive: E
Owner: FS
Location in reviewed document:
General

Comment:
 
UAProf is mentioned several times in the text, but not in the references.
We guess you mean 
UAProf profile repository [http://w3development.de/rdf/uaprof_repository/]
..


Working Group Resolution:
Thanks for pointing this out. We have included a reference to the OMA
documentation on UAPROF.



----

Received on Wednesday, 12 April 2006 17:13:51 UTC