- From: <dom@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 17:05:09 +0000 (GMT)
- To: <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Cc: public-bpwg-comments@w3.org
[Sorry for the duplicate] Dear <fsasaki@w3.org>, The Mobile Web Best Practice Working Group has reviewed the comments you sent [1] on the Last Call Working Draft [2] of the Mobile Web Best Practices 1.0 published on 13 January 2006 Thank you for having taken the time to review the document and to send us comments! This message holds the disposition of the said comments on which the Working Group has agreed. This disposition has been implemented in the new version of the document available at: http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-mobile-bp-20060412/ Please review it carefully and let us know if you agree with it or not before 3 May 2006. In case of disagreement, you are requested to provide a specific solution for or a path to a consensus with the Working Group. If such a consensus cannot be achieved, you will be given the opportunity to raise a formal objection which will then be reviewed by the Director during the transition of this document to the next stage in the W3C Recommendation Track. Thanks, For the Mobile Web Best Practice Working Group, Philipp Hoschka Dominique Hazaƫl-Massieux W3C Staff Contacts 1. http://www.w3.org/mid/20060222165443.6A738439B@toro.w3.mag.keio.ac.jp 2. http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-mobile-bp-20060113/ ===== Your comment on [CHARACTER_ENCODING_...: Comment from the i18n review of: http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-mobile-bp-20060113/ Comment 18 At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0602-mwbp10/ Editorial/substantive: S Owner: RI Location in reviewed document: 5.4.12 Comment: The section mentions the use of the XML declaration for declaring in-document the encoding of XML documents, but makes no mention of the standard in-document declaration of encoding for HTML documents or XHTML served as text/html, which uses the Content-Type meta element. This seems a strange omission. Please add text describing this. Working Group Resolution: We have added a link to the I18N tutorial on specifying the encoding and have added the specific case you mention in the related technique: http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/techs/SpecifyingCharacterEncoding (note that the document only focuses on XHTML, not on HTML) ----
Received on Wednesday, 12 April 2006 17:14:06 UTC