Re: [CONTEXT] not a requirement

[Sorry for the duplicate]

  Dear Charles McCathieNevile ,

The Mobile Web Best Practice Working Group has reviewed the comments you
sent [1] on the Last Call Working Draft [2] of the Mobile Web Best
Practices 1.0 published on 13 January 2006 Thank you for having taken the
time to review the document and to send us comments!

This message holds the disposition of the said comments on which the
Working Group has agreed. This disposition has been implemented in the new
version of the document available at:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-mobile-bp-20060412/

Please review it carefully and let us know if you agree with it or not
before 3 May 2006. In case of disagreement, you are requested to provide a
specific solution for or a path to a consensus with the Working Group. If
such a consensus cannot be achieved, you will be given the opportunity to
raise a formal objection which will then be reviewed by the Director
during the transition of this document to the next stage in the W3C
Recommendation Track.

Thanks,

For the Mobile Web Best Practice Working Group,
Philipp Hoschka
Dominique Hazaël-Massieux
W3C Staff Contacts

 1. http://www.w3.org/mid/op.s4mzlnliwxe0ny@widsith.local
 2. http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-mobile-bp-20060113/


=====

Your comment on [CONTEXT] Take all r...:
There are many types of content which do not require any adaptation. There
 is no point in these services determining any kind of context. Further,
there is no point in determining context in any circumstances for a 
service that cannot make use of the information.



This is not a best practice in itself, merely a technique that can be used
 

to meet some others.



In addition, as has been noted by others, having it appear first gives an 


impression of a strong bias against the one web goal stated elsewhere.



cheers



Chaals

Working Group Resolution:
We agreed with this and moved this Best Practice as a technique.

----

Received on Wednesday, 12 April 2006 17:14:07 UTC