public-annotation@w3.org from March 2015 by author

Amrapali J Zaveri

• CFP: 2nd Workshop on Linked Data Qquality at ESWC #LDQ2015 (Thursday, 5 March)

Ben De Meester

• Re: [admin] Agenda - teleconference 11 March 2015 (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: [admin] Agenda - teleconference 4 March 2015 (Wednesday, 4 March)

Benjamin Young

• Re: Call? (Wednesday, 25 March)
• Re: [admin] Agenda - teleconference 11 March 2015 (Wednesday, 11 March)
• What would we like from the Social Web F2F event? (Friday, 6 March)
• Re: anno-ACTION-9: Should the media type of the target be stated to clarify FragmentSelector availability (Wednesday, 4 March)

Bill Kasdorf

• RE: Rough Draft of Robust Anchoring: the RangeFinder API (Wednesday, 25 March)
• RE: Rough Draft of Robust Anchoring: the RangeFinder API (Wednesday, 25 March)
• RE: multiple bodies and motivations (Friday, 20 March)
• RE: [admin] Agenda - teleconference 18 March 2015 (Tuesday, 17 March)
• RE: [admin] Agenda - teleconference 11 March 2015 (Wednesday, 11 March)

Coralie Mercier

• Call for Exclusions (update): Web Annotation Data Model (Thursday, 26 March)

Dave Cramer

• Re: [admin] Agenda - teleconference 4 March 2015 (Wednesday, 4 March)

Denenberg, Ray

• Essence of the annotation protocol (Tuesday, 31 March)
• Call? (Wednesday, 25 March)
• RE: multiple bodies and motivations (Friday, 20 March)
• RE: multiple bodies and motivations (Friday, 20 March)
• RE: multiple bodies and motivations (Friday, 20 March)
• RE: Proposal: Replace dctypes with schema.org (Friday, 20 March)
• RE: multiple bodies and motivations (Wednesday, 18 March)
• RE: multiple bodies and motivations (Wednesday, 18 March)
• RE: multiple bodies and motivations (Wednesday, 18 March)
• multiple bodies and motivations (Wednesday, 18 March)
• RE: protocol question (Wednesday, 18 March)
• protocol question (Tuesday, 17 March)
• RE: Class of an annotation body (Tuesday, 10 March)
• RE: Class of an annotation body (Monday, 9 March)
• RE: Class of an annotation body (Monday, 9 March)
• RE: Class of an annotation body (Monday, 9 March)
• Class of an annotation body (Monday, 9 March)

Doug Schepers

• Re: Rough Draft of Robust Anchoring: the RangeFinder API (Wednesday, 25 March)
• Re: Rough Draft of Robust Anchoring: the RangeFinder API (Wednesday, 25 March)
• Re: Rough Draft of Robust Anchoring: the RangeFinder API (Wednesday, 25 March)
• Fwd: W3C TPAC 2015 - Will your group meet in Sapporo? (Wednesday, 18 March)

Frederick Hirsch

• Re: Call? (Wednesday, 25 March)
• [admin] Teleconference canceled - next call is 8 April (Wednesday, 25 March)
• [admin] Draft Minutes 18 March 2015 Web Annotation WG teleconference (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: [admin] Agenda - teleconference 18 March 2015 (Tuesday, 17 March)
• [admin] draft minutes from 11 March 2015 teleconference (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: What would we like from the Social Web F2F event? (Wednesday, 11 March)
• [admin] Agenda - teleconference 11 March 2015 (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: Rough Draft of Robust Anchoring: the RangeFinder API (Monday, 9 March)
• Re: Minutes of the meeting 2015-03-04 (Thursday, 5 March)
• [admin] Agenda - teleconference 4 March 2015 (Wednesday, 4 March)
• Re: Social Web F2F (Monday, 2 March)

Harry Halpin

• Annotations rep to Social F2F [was Re: Social Web F2F] (Wednesday, 4 March)
• Re: Social Web F2F (Monday, 2 March)

Ivan Herman

• Re: [web-annotation] Should Annotation concept and document be distinguished? (Monday, 30 March)
• Re: [admin] draft minutes from 11 March 2015 teleconference (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: Class of an annotation body (Tuesday, 10 March)
• Re: Class of an annotation body (Monday, 9 March)
• Re: Minutes of the meeting 2015-03-04 (Thursday, 5 March)
• Minutes of the meeting 2015-03-04 (Wednesday, 4 March)
• The big DST telco chaos is coming! (Tuesday, 3 March)

Jacob Jett

• Re: Proposal: Replace dctypes with schema.org (Sunday, 22 March)
• Re: multiple bodies and motivations (Friday, 20 March)
• Re: Proposal: Replace dctypes with schema.org (Friday, 20 March)
• Re: multiple bodies and motivations (Friday, 20 March)
• Re: multiple bodies and motivations (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: multiple bodies and motivations (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: multiple bodies and motivations (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: Class of an annotation body (Tuesday, 10 March)
• Re: Class of an annotation body (Monday, 9 March)

Kanai, Takeshi

• Solution proposal for Issue #12 (Tuesday, 24 March)

Kristof Csillag

• Re: [admin] Agenda - teleconference 18 March 2015 (Tuesday, 17 March)
• Re: [admin] Agenda - teleconference 11 March 2015 (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: Rough Draft of Robust Anchoring: the RangeFinder API (Thursday, 5 March)

Liam R. E. Quin

• Re: Rough Draft of Robust Anchoring: the RangeFinder API (Wednesday, 25 March)
• Re: Rough Draft of Robust Anchoring: the RangeFinder API (Tuesday, 24 March)

Luc Moreau

• Re: [web-annotation] Should Annotation concept and document be distinguished? (Monday, 30 March)
• Re: [admin] Agenda - teleconference 18 March 2015 (Tuesday, 17 March)

Paolo Ciccarese

• Re: Call? (Wednesday, 25 March)

Randall Leeds

• Re: [web-annotation] Should Annotation concept and document be distinguished? (Monday, 30 March)
• Re: Proposal: Replace dctypes with schema.org (Friday, 20 March)
• Re: multiple bodies and motivations (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: multiple bodies and motivations (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: multiple bodies and motivations (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: [admin] Agenda - teleconference 18 March 2015 (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: Social Web F2F (Wednesday, 4 March)
• Re: Social Web F2F (Monday, 2 March)

Randall Leeds via GitHub

• Re: [web-annotation] JSON-LD Context keys (Wednesday, 18 March)

Rob Sanderson via GitHub

• [web-annotation] Clarify status of specification table in 4.2.1 (Wednesday, 4 March)
• [web-annotation] Add RFC7111 to FragmentSelector list (Wednesday, 4 March)

Robert Sanderson

• Re: Proposal: Replace dctypes with schema.org (Friday, 20 March)
• Re: multiple bodies and motivations (Friday, 20 March)
• Proposal: Replace dctypes with schema.org (Friday, 20 March)
• Re: multiple bodies and motivations (Friday, 20 March)
• Re: protocol question (Tuesday, 17 March)
• [admin] Agenda - teleconference 18 March 2015 (Tuesday, 17 March)
• Re: Class of an annotation body (Monday, 9 March)

Stian Soiland-Reyes

• Re: Proposal: Replace dctypes with schema.org (Tuesday, 24 March)
• Re: Class of an annotation body (Tuesday, 10 March)

Swenson, Kyrce

• Re: [admin] Agenda - teleconference 4 March 2015 (Wednesday, 4 March)

Web Annotation Working Group Issue Tracker

• anno-ISSUE-23: Should the media type of the target be stated to clarify FragmentSelector availability (Wednesday, 4 March)
• anno-ACTION-9: Should the media type of the target be stated to clarify FragmentSelector availability (Wednesday, 4 March)
• ISSUE-22: 4.2.1 clarify if fragment specification table is normative or non-normative (Wednesday, 4 March)
• ISSUE-21: Add rfc 7111 to fragment selector table ; and look for other specs (Wednesday, 4 March)
• ISSUE-20: Https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/11 (Wednesday, 4 March)
• ISSUE-19: Clarify extent of filtering, client local vs search and server side, system impacts (Wednesday, 4 March)

Last message date: Tuesday, 31 March 2015 21:24:39 UTC