Re: [web-annotation] Should Annotation concept and document be distinguished?

Hi Rob, all

Here is my proposal for the mapping to PROV.
As I thought this was a useful technique I wrote a standalone blog post 
about it.
https://lucmoreau.wordpress.com/2015/03/30/provenance-recipe-mapping-shortcuts-to-prov/

Feedback welcome!

Luc


On 18/02/15 22:00, Rob Sanderson via GitHub wrote:
> @lucmoreau Could you propose a solution?
>
> The options that occur to me:
>    * Simply drop the subPropertyOf relationship to prov for
> serializedBy/At.  This doesn't feel clean.
>    * Split the annotation node to always refer to the concept and then
> not require a node in the graph for the document.  So if you want to
> give serializedBy/At you have a new node that otherwise isn't present.
>   We could then just use the prov terms directly. This feels cleaner
> .... but a lot more expensive when the information should be captured.
>
> Also discussed on the call today was:
>    * Drop serializedBy/At completely, but this was not viewed
> favorably.
>
> Thanks!
>

-- 
Professor Luc Moreau
Head of the Web and Internet Science Group
Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
University of Southampton          twitter: @lucmoreau
Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK           http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm

Received on Monday, 30 March 2015 10:56:58 UTC