- From: Web Annotation Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2015 17:21:19 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
anno-ISSUE-23: Should the media type of the target be stated to clarify FragmentSelector availability http://www.w3.org/annotation/track/issues/23 Raised by: Benjamin Young On product: The topic of Annotating CSVs came up as a use case recently: https://www.w3.org/annotation/wiki/Annotating_CSV_Data It is already possible to Annotate them by using CSV selectors defined in RFC 7111--which is associated with the `text/csv` media type: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7111 The current method of expressing which `oa:FragmentSelector` to use is by referencing the documentation for that selector via `dcterms:conformsTo`: http://www.w3.org/TR/annotation-model/#fragment-selector However, current practice and process dictates that fragment selectors be determined in relation to media type registration with IANA. Subsequent selector definitions (by extension) require a media type registration update. As such, including the media type of a target (such as `text/csv`) would also imply how the value of `oa:FragmentSelector` should be handled. Should the media type of the target be stated to clarify FragmentSelector availability?
Received on Wednesday, 4 March 2015 17:21:20 UTC