- From: Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 11:00:16 -0700
- To: Web Annotation <public-annotation@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CABevsUFzF-B5h5aSif5KyyoyvZim38ZEP3dzqfvFn2DqS33Qyg@mail.gmail.com>
As discussed on the call on Wednesday, we should make a change to the list of types for body and target at least to replace Image with StillImage. A further suggestion was that we should consider schema.org classes as more modern and likely to be better integrated with other systems. It would also give us easy classes for Code, SoftwareApplication, Game, WebPage... but there isn't one (that I can find) for generic Textual content. schema:Text is a datatype, rather than a class for resources. Thus the list maps currently as: Dataset --> schema:Dataset StillImage --> schema:ImageObject MovingImage --> schema:VideoObject Sound --> schema:AudioObject Text --> :( We could be more explicit with our typing for Text: oa:Tag when the body is a tag. oa:SemanticTag when it's a semantic tag schema:Comment when it's a comment [w/ oa:commenting] schema:Review when the body is a review schema:WebPage when the body/target is a full webpage schema:WebPageElement when the body/target is part of a page And then leave anything beyond those to further communities to define? Is there anything in our current set of use cases that would fall out side of the above? Thanks! Rob -- Rob Sanderson Information Standards Advocate Digital Library Systems and Services Stanford, CA 94305
Received on Friday, 20 March 2015 18:00:47 UTC