xmlschema-dev@w3.org from March 2011 by author

Andrew Leslie

• extending namespaces (Wednesday, 2 March)

Andrew Welch

• Re: Classroom critique of XML Schema 1.1 (Saturday, 19 March)
• Re: Classroom critique of XML Schema 1.1 (Saturday, 19 March)
• Re: extending namespaces (Wednesday, 2 March)

Andy Davidson

• Re: What is lost if xsd:choice is jettisoned? (Thursday, 10 March)

Brendan_Crowley@DellTeam.com

• No external markup declarations present - referenced entity 'è' must be declared. (Wednesday, 23 March)

C. M. Sperberg-McQueen

• Re: Classroom critique of XML Schema 1.1 (Sunday, 20 March)
• Re: Classroom critique of XML Schema 1.1 (Saturday, 19 March)
• Re: What is lost if xsd:choice is jettisoned? (Thursday, 10 March)
• Re: What is lost if xsd:choice is jettisoned? (Thursday, 10 March)
• Re: How to define a value space that is a cross-product of simpleType value spaces? (Saturday, 5 March)
• Re: extending namespaces (Saturday, 5 March)

Cheney, Edward A SSG RES USAR USARC

• Re: Classroom critique of XML Schema 1.1 (UNCLASSIFIED) (Friday, 18 March)

Costello, Roger L.

• RE: Terminology: does an XML Schema "declare" a targetNamespace? "specify" a targetNamespace? (Sunday, 27 March)
• Terminology: does an XML Schema "declare" a targetNamespace? "specify" a targetNamespace? (Sunday, 27 March)
• XML Schema 1.1 Best Practice: Positioning Additional Constraints (Saturday, 26 March)
• RE: Classroom critique of XML Schema 1.1 (Saturday, 19 March)
• RE: Classroom critique of XML Schema 1.1 (Saturday, 19 March)
• RE: Classroom critique of XML Schema 1.1 (Saturday, 19 March)
• RE: Classroom critique of XML Schema 1.1 (Saturday, 19 March)
• Classroom critique of XML Schema 1.1 (Friday, 18 March)
• [Summary] What is lost if xsd:choice is jettisoned? (Friday, 11 March)
• RE: What is lost if xsd:choice is jettisoned? (Thursday, 10 March)
• What is lost if xsd:choice is jettisoned? (Tuesday, 8 March)

David Ezell

• RE: What is lost if xsd:choice is jettisoned? (Thursday, 10 March)

G. Ken Holman

• Re: No external markup declarations present - referenced entity 'è' must be declared. (Saturday, 26 March)

George Cristian Bina

• Re: What is lost if xsd:choice is jettisoned? (Wednesday, 9 March)
• Re: What is lost if xsd:choice is jettisoned? (Tuesday, 8 March)

Kevin Braun

• Re: What is lost if xsd:choice is jettisoned? (Tuesday, 8 March)

Liam R E Quin

• Re: XSD for 'at least one of' (Friday, 25 March)
• Re: Classroom critique of XML Schema 1.1 (Saturday, 19 March)
• RE: Classroom critique of XML Schema 1.1 (Saturday, 19 March)

Michael Kay

• Re: Terminology: does an XML Schema "declare" a targetNamespace? "specify" a targetNamespace? (Monday, 28 March)
• Re: Terminology: does an XML Schema "declare" a targetNamespace? "specify" a targetNamespace? (Sunday, 27 March)
• Re: Classroom critique of XML Schema 1.1 (Saturday, 19 March)
• Re: Classroom critique of XML Schema 1.1 (Saturday, 19 March)
• Re: What is lost if xsd:choice is jettisoned? (Wednesday, 9 March)

Mukul Gandhi

• Re: Terminology: does an XML Schema "declare" a targetNamespace? "specify" a targetNamespace? (Monday, 28 March)
• Re: Terminology: does an XML Schema "declare" a targetNamespace? "specify" a targetNamespace? (Sunday, 27 March)
• Re: What is lost if xsd:choice is jettisoned? (Wednesday, 9 March)

Noah Mendelsohn

• Re: Classroom critique of XML Schema 1.1 (Saturday, 19 March)
• Re: Classroom critique of XML Schema 1.1 (Saturday, 19 March)
• Re: Classroom critique of XML Schema 1.1 (Saturday, 19 March)

Pete Cordell

• Re: What is lost if xsd:choice is jettisoned? (Thursday, 10 March)

Łukasz Pogorzelski

• Re: XSD for 'at least one of' (Wednesday, 16 March)

Last message date: Monday, 28 March 2011 09:43:15 UTC