public-xhtml2@w3.org from February 2009: by thread

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Henri Sivonen (Friday, 27 February)

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Henri Sivonen (Friday, 27 February)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Karl Dubost (Friday, 27 February)
- Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Henri Sivonen (Friday, 27 February)
  - Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Shane McCarron (Friday, 27 February)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Manu Sporny (Friday, 27 February)
- Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Julian Reschke (Friday, 27 February)
  - Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Manu Sporny (Friday, 27 February)
    - Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Henri Sivonen (Friday, 27 February)
      - Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida (Friday, 27 February)
- Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida (Friday, 27 February)
  - Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Mark Nottingham (Friday, 27 February)
    - Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida (Saturday, 28 February)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com (Friday, 27 February)
- Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Julian Reschke (Friday, 27 February)
  - Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida (Friday, 27 February)
    - Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Julian Reschke (Friday, 27 February)
      - Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida (Friday, 27 February)
        
        Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Julian Reschke (Friday, 27 February)
        
        Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida (Friday, 27 February)
        Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Julian Reschke (Friday, 27 February)
        Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida (Friday, 27 February)
        Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Julian Reschke (Saturday, 28 February)
        Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida (Saturday, 28 February)
        Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Julian Reschke (Saturday, 28 February)
        
        Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Maciej Stachowiak (Saturday, 28 February)
        Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida (Saturday, 28 February)
        Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Rob Sayre (Saturday, 28 February)
        
        Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Sam Ruby (Saturday, 28 February)
        Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida (Saturday, 28 February)
        Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Julian Reschke (Saturday, 28 February)
        Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida (Saturday, 28 February)
        Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Julian Reschke (Saturday, 28 February)
        Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida (Saturday, 28 February)
        Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Julian Reschke (Saturday, 28 February)
        Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Karl Dubost (Saturday, 28 February)
        Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Manu Sporny (Saturday, 28 February)
        Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Sam Ruby (Saturday, 28 February)
        
        Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Dan Brickley (Friday, 27 February)
        Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida (Friday, 27 February)
    - Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Robert J Burns (Friday, 27 February)
  - Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com (Saturday, 28 February)
- Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Mark Nottingham (Friday, 27 February)
  - Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Rob Sayre (Saturday, 28 February)
    - Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Sam Ruby (Saturday, 28 February)
      - Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Rob Sayre (Saturday, 28 February)

Re: [Fwd: Using XMLNS in link/@rel] Steven Pemberton (Friday, 27 February)

Re: [Fwd: Using XMLNS in link/@rel] Mark Nottingham (Friday, 27 February)
- Re: [Fwd: Using XMLNS in link/@rel] Phil Archer (Friday, 27 February)
  - Re: [Fwd: Using XMLNS in link/@rel] Julian Reschke (Friday, 27 February)
  - Re: [Fwd: Using XMLNS in link/@rel] Mark Nottingham (Friday, 27 February)
- Re: [Fwd: Using XMLNS in link/@rel] Steven Pemberton (Friday, 27 February)
  - Re: [Fwd: Using XMLNS in link/@rel] Julian Reschke (Friday, 27 February)

Minutes 25 February 2009 Steven Pemberton (Wednesday, 25 February)

[Fwd: FYI: Link -04] Shane McCarron (Wednesday, 25 February)

Re: [Fwd: FYI: Link -04] Michael Hausenblas (Thursday, 26 February)

Agenda points Steven Pemberton (Wednesday, 25 February)

Re: Agenda points Mark Birbeck (Wednesday, 25 February)

Fwd: Transition Announcement: WAI-ARIA Last Call and WAI-ARIA User Agent Implementation Guide FPWD Steven Pemberton (Wednesday, 25 February)

[XHTML] minutes: 2009-02-19 Weekly Telecon [draft] Gregory J. Rosmaita (Wednesday, 18 February)

Agenda 18 February 2009 Steven Pemberton (Wednesday, 18 February)

Re: Agenda 18 February 2009 Mark Birbeck (Wednesday, 18 February)

Comments on XHTML Media Types Note - Second Edition Simon Pieters (Friday, 13 February)

minutes: XHTML WG weekly telecon 2009-02-11 [draft] Gregory J. Rosmaita (Wednesday, 11 February)

ARIA roles and XHTML Vocab revision Gregory J. Rosmaita (Wednesday, 11 February)

[XHTML] Agenda 2009-02-11 Roland Merrick (Wednesday, 11 February)

Re: [XHTML] Agenda 2009-02-11 Mark Birbeck (Wednesday, 11 February)
- Re: [XHTML] Agenda 2009-02-11 Shane McCarron (Wednesday, 11 February)
  - Re: [XHTML] Agenda 2009-02-11 Alessio Cartocci (Wednesday, 11 February)

Fw: Regret, 18-02-2009 Roland Merrick (Tuesday, 10 February)

Modules, Modularization, and the XHTML Family Shane McCarron (Friday, 6 February)

Re: Modules, Modularization, and the XHTML Family Markus Gylling (Monday, 9 February)
- Re: Modules, Modularization, and the XHTML Family Roland Merrick (Tuesday, 10 February)
Re: Modules, Modularization, and the XHTML Family Gregory J. Rosmaita (Wednesday, 11 February)

Fwd: Any objections or concerns about styles for common spec features? Steven Pemberton (Friday, 6 February)

Re: Any objections or concerns about styles for common spec features? Gregory J. Rosmaita (Friday, 6 February)

[XHTML2] INS, DEL, and MOD Gregory J. Rosmaita (Thursday, 5 February)

Re: [XHTML2] INS, DEL, and MOD Roland Merrick (Tuesday, 10 February)
- Re: [XHTML2] INS, DEL, and MOD Gregory J. Rosmaita (Wednesday, 11 February)

Re: [XHTMLAccess] i18n comment 2: Keycode or character Steven Pemberton (Thursday, 5 February)

RE: [XHTMLAccess] i18n comment 2: Keycode or character Phillips, Addison (Thursday, 5 February)
- Re: [XHTMLAccess] i18n comment 2: Keycode or character Steven Pemberton (Thursday, 5 February)
- RE: [XHTMLAccess] i18n comment 2: Keycode or character Gregory J. Rosmaita (Thursday, 5 February)

Minutes 4 february 2009 Steven Pemberton (Wednesday, 4 February)

Re: XHTML MIME Types note Steven Pemberton (Wednesday, 4 February)

Minutes 28 January 2009 Steven Pemberton (Wednesday, 4 February)

4th of Feb 2009 - no phone line. Tina Holmboe (Wednesday, 4 February)

[XHTML] Agenda 2009-02-04 Roland Merrick (Wednesday, 4 February)

Re: [XHTML] Agenda 2009-02-04 Mark Birbeck (Wednesday, 4 February)

Re: [XHTML Media Types - Second Edition] Japanese translation now available Coralie Mercier (Tuesday, 3 February)

Fwd: [XMLEvents2] A scripting-only alternative to XBL2 Steven Pemberton (Tuesday, 3 February)

RE: Can we have @lang back in XHTML Family? Richard Ishida (Monday, 2 February)

Re: Can we have @lang back in XHTML Family? fantasai (Tuesday, 3 February)
- Re: Can we have @lang back in XHTML Family? Shane McCarron (Tuesday, 3 February)
Re: Can we have @lang back in XHTML Family? Steven Pemberton (Wednesday, 4 February)

Last message date: Saturday, 28 February 2009 23:33:55 UTC