public-xhtml2@w3.org from February 2009 by author

Alessio Cartocci

Re: [XHTML] Agenda 2009-02-11 (Wednesday, 11 February)

Ben Adida

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Saturday, 28 February)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Saturday, 28 February)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Saturday, 28 February)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Saturday, 28 February)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Saturday, 28 February)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Saturday, 28 February)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)

Coralie Mercier

Re: [XHTML Media Types - Second Edition] Japanese translation now available (Tuesday, 3 February)

Dan Brickley

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)

fantasai

Re: Can we have @lang back in XHTML Family? (Tuesday, 3 February)

Gregory J. Rosmaita

[XHTML] minutes: 2009-02-19 Weekly Telecon [draft] (Wednesday, 18 February)
minutes: XHTML WG weekly telecon 2009-02-11 [draft] (Wednesday, 11 February)
ARIA roles and XHTML Vocab revision (Wednesday, 11 February)
Re: [XHTML2] INS, DEL, and MOD (Wednesday, 11 February)
Re: Modules, Modularization, and the XHTML Family (Wednesday, 11 February)
Re: Any objections or concerns about styles for common spec features? (Friday, 6 February)
[XHTML2] INS, DEL, and MOD (Thursday, 5 February)
RE: [XHTMLAccess] i18n comment 2: Keycode or character (Thursday, 5 February)

Henri Sivonen

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)

Julian Reschke

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Saturday, 28 February)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Saturday, 28 February)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Saturday, 28 February)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Saturday, 28 February)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Saturday, 28 February)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)
Re: [Fwd: Using XMLNS in link/@rel] (Friday, 27 February)
Re: [Fwd: Using XMLNS in link/@rel] (Friday, 27 February)

Karl Dubost

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Saturday, 28 February)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)

Maciej Stachowiak

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Saturday, 28 February)

Manu Sporny

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Saturday, 28 February)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)

Mark Birbeck

Re: Agenda points (Wednesday, 25 February)
Re: Agenda 18 February 2009 (Wednesday, 18 February)
Re: [XHTML] Agenda 2009-02-11 (Wednesday, 11 February)
Re: [XHTML] Agenda 2009-02-04 (Wednesday, 4 February)

Mark Nottingham

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)
Re: [Fwd: Using XMLNS in link/@rel] (Friday, 27 February)
Re: [Fwd: Using XMLNS in link/@rel] (Friday, 27 February)

Markus Gylling

Re: Modules, Modularization, and the XHTML Family (Monday, 9 February)

Michael Hausenblas

Re: [Fwd: FYI: Link -04] (Thursday, 26 February)

noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Saturday, 28 February)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)

Phil Archer

Re: [Fwd: Using XMLNS in link/@rel] (Friday, 27 February)

Phillips, Addison

RE: [XHTMLAccess] i18n comment 2: Keycode or character (Thursday, 5 February)

Richard Ishida

RE: Can we have @lang back in XHTML Family? (Monday, 2 February)

Rob Sayre

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Saturday, 28 February)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Saturday, 28 February)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Saturday, 28 February)

Robert J Burns

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)

Roland Merrick

[XHTML] Agenda 2009-02-11 (Wednesday, 11 February)
Re: Modules, Modularization, and the XHTML Family (Tuesday, 10 February)
Fw: Regret, 18-02-2009 (Tuesday, 10 February)
Re: [XHTML2] INS, DEL, and MOD (Tuesday, 10 February)
[XHTML] Agenda 2009-02-04 (Wednesday, 4 February)

Sam Ruby

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Saturday, 28 February)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Saturday, 28 February)
Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Saturday, 28 February)

Shane McCarron

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)
[Fwd: FYI: Link -04] (Wednesday, 25 February)
Re: [XHTML] Agenda 2009-02-11 (Wednesday, 11 February)
Modules, Modularization, and the XHTML Family (Friday, 6 February)
Re: Can we have @lang back in XHTML Family? (Tuesday, 3 February)

Simon Pieters

Comments on XHTML Media Types Note - Second Edition (Friday, 13 February)

Steven Pemberton

Re: [Fwd: Using XMLNS in link/@rel] (Friday, 27 February)
Re: [Fwd: Using XMLNS in link/@rel] (Friday, 27 February)
Minutes 25 February 2009 (Wednesday, 25 February)
Agenda points (Wednesday, 25 February)
Fwd: Transition Announcement: WAI-ARIA Last Call and WAI-ARIA User Agent Implementation Guide FPWD (Wednesday, 25 February)
Agenda 18 February 2009 (Wednesday, 18 February)
Fwd: Any objections or concerns about styles for common spec features? (Friday, 6 February)
Re: [XHTMLAccess] i18n comment 2: Keycode or character (Thursday, 5 February)
Re: [XHTMLAccess] i18n comment 2: Keycode or character (Thursday, 5 February)
Minutes 4 february 2009 (Wednesday, 4 February)
Re: Can we have @lang back in XHTML Family? (Wednesday, 4 February)
Re: XHTML MIME Types note (Wednesday, 4 February)
Minutes 28 January 2009 (Wednesday, 4 February)
Fwd: [XMLEvents2] A scripting-only alternative to XBL2 (Tuesday, 3 February)

Tina Holmboe

4th of Feb 2009 - no phone line. (Wednesday, 4 February)

Last message date: Saturday, 28 February 2009 23:33:55 UTC