W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xhtml2@w3.org > February 2009

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel

From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 08:44:21 -0600
Message-ID: <49A7FC45.60104@aptest.com>
To: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
CC: Karl Dubost <karl@la-grange.net>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>, "www-tag@w3.org WG" <www-tag@w3.org>, RDFa mailing list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, public-xhtml2@w3.org

Henri Sivonen wrote:
> Indeed. However, the remedy of errataing RDFa to use full URIs instead 
> of CURIEs would address both that issue and the rel *value* issue Mark 
> Nottingham raised. (Well, at least if the full URIs used as rel tokens 
> do not have upper case letters A-Z.)
Sure.  However, CURIEs are NOT a mistake in a recommendation that could 
ever be "errated" out.  Any change of that magnitude would require a new 
version of the specification with corresponding review cycles, 
balloting, etc.  And I, at least, would object to such a change.

Shane P. McCarron                          Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
Managing Director                            Fax: +1 763 786-8180
ApTest Minnesota                            Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Friday, 27 February 2009 14:45:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:30:31 UTC