On Feb 27, 2009, at 17:38, Manu Sporny wrote: > Specifically, Henri's comment: > > "More generally, I think it would make sense to issue an erratum that > replaces all CURIEs in RDFa with the corresponding full URIs" > > ...seemed to imply (NOTE: I'm not saying that this was intentional!) > that this had not been discussed previously. I didn't mean to imply such a thing. Karl had already pointed out the previous thread albeit only on www-tag: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2009Feb/0278.html What I meant to say that I agreed with mnot's erratum idea and thought it would make sense to generalize it beyond rel. In general, instead of just referring to the old emails, I wanted to make my point in a more coherent way than previously (when the facets of the issue were spread across multiple shorter emails each of which was too short and needed amending). -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/Received on Friday, 27 February 2009 16:08:15 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 February 2009 16:08:16 GMT