W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xhtml2@w3.org > February 2009

Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel

From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 18:07:29 +0200
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, "www-tag@w3.org WG" <www-tag@w3.org>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>, RDFa mailing list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, public-xhtml2@w3.org
Message-Id: <C13E9C29-9CB2-4701-81CA-AEEE27594E82@iki.fi>
To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
On Feb 27, 2009, at 17:38, Manu Sporny wrote:

> Specifically, Henri's comment:
> "More generally, I think it would make sense to issue an erratum that
> replaces all CURIEs in RDFa with the corresponding full URIs"
> ...seemed to imply (NOTE: I'm not saying that this was intentional!)
> that this had not been discussed previously.

I didn't mean to imply such a thing. Karl had already pointed out the  
previous thread albeit only on www-tag:

What I meant to say that I agreed with mnot's erratum idea and thought  
it would make sense to generalize it beyond rel.

In general, instead of just referring to the old emails, I wanted to  
make my point in a more coherent way than previously (when the facets  
of the issue were spread across multiple shorter emails each of which  
was too short and needed amending).

Henri Sivonen
Received on Friday, 27 February 2009 16:08:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:30:31 UTC