Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel from Ben Adida on 2009-02-27 (public-xhtml2@w3.org from February 2009)

From: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 15:02:02 -0800
To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
CC: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>, RDFa mailing list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, public-xhtml2@w3.org, "www-tag@w3.org WG" <www-tag@w3.org>
Message-ID: <49A870EA.10104@adida.net>

Dan Brickley wrote:
> Erm, perhaps more like working with the HTML5 team to explore options
> for mutually bearable concensus and compromise? :)

I think everyone agrees that having the same interpretation of @rel in
all versions of HTML would be a good thing, no matter what.

If it's only *my* goal and not that of folks within HTML5, then I'm just
being honest about my goal, not implying that it's my way or the highway :)

-Ben

Received on Friday, 27 February 2009 23:03:50 UTC