W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-policy@w3.org > January 2007

Re: [VER2] Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 22 - 2007-01-03

From: Mark Little <mark.little@jboss.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 15:22:37 +0000
Message-Id: <AAD0C52E-3A8A-4C08-85B3-0276F5E009FF@jboss.com>
Cc: "Christopher B Ferris" <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>, <public-ws-policy@w3.org>
To: Toufic Boubez <tboubez@layer7tech.com>
+1


On 3 Jan 2007, at 08:58, Toufic Boubez wrote:

> Regrets for tomorrow. I am on vacation this week and not allowed to  
> use my laptop! :)
>
>   --  Toufic
>
> Toufic Boubez, Ph.D.
> Chief Technology Officer
> (o)  604.681.9377 x310
> (m) 604.288.7970
>
> Secure, Simplify, Scale your Web Services.
>
> From: public-ws-policy-request@w3.org on behalf of Christopher B  
> Ferris
> Sent: Tue 1/2/2007 8:18 AM
> To: public-ws-policy@w3.org
> Subject: [VER2] Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 22 - 2007-01-03
>
>
> Updated Actions with resolutions
> Added recent new issues
> Updated open issues with email thread links
>
> Cheers,
>
> Christopher Ferris
> STSM, Software Group Standards Strategy
> email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com
> blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/chrisferris
> phone: +1 508 377 9295
>
> __________________
>
>
> Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 22 - 2007-01-03
>
> The phone number to use for the WS-Policy WG F2F is documented on  
> the WG's administrative home page:
> http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/policy/admin#phone
>
> Participants are invited to join IRC channel #ws-policy as  
> documented on the WG's administrative home page. Please register  
> with Zakim:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-ws-policy/2006Aug/0012.html
>
> 1. Roll call and selection of secretary, Chair
>
> a) Scribe List:
>
> Glen Daniels (scribe for Jan 3)
> Dimitar Angelov
> Sanjiva Weerawarana
> Ruchith Fernando
> Jeffrey Crump
> Tom Jordahl
> Vladislav Bezrukov
> ----------------------
> Jeff Mischkinsky
> William Henry
> Prasad Yendluri
> Abbie Barbir
> Anthony Nadalin
> Ashok Malhotra
> Daniel Roth
> Sergey Beryozkin
> Charlton Barreto
> Sanka Samaranayake
> Frederick Hirsch
> Fabian Ritzmann
> David Orchard
> Toufic Boubez
> Yakov Sverdlov
> Felix Sasaki
> Ümit Yalçinalp
> Asir Vedamuthu
> Maryann Hondo
> Dale Moberg
> Chris Ferris
> Mark Little
> Monica Martin
>
> b) Scribe FAQ (Updated)
> Member only:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-ws-policy/2006Oct/0001.html
>
> 2. Review and approval of previous minutes, Chair
> http://www.w3.org/2006/12/20-ws-policy-minutes.html
>
> 3. Future WG meetings, Chair
>
> a) Next distributed meeting is Wed Jan 10 - Chair is Paul Cotton.
>
> b) Please make your plans for attending the F2F in Jan, hosted by BEA
> in San Francisco.
> http://www.w3.org/2007/01/ws-policy-f2f-logistics.html
> Status: Registration closes on Fri Jan 5.
>
> c) Future meetings
> http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/policy/admin#meetings
>
> 4. Editorial team report
>
> a) ACTION-172 Produce a proposal for resolving issue 4041 by  
> January 10 Editors
>
> b) Documents for review for F2F meeting
>
> 5. Review action items, Chair
> Open action items - Member only:
> http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicy/actions/open
>
> ACTION-166 Help drive the publication of the WD Primer and FPWD  
> Guidelines drafts, by Dec 21 Felix Sasaki
> Status: DONE.
> Note that the public WS-Policy page needs to be updated to link to  
> the published drafts.
>
> ACTION-170 Work with Monica on a concrete proposal for changes to  
> the Primer to accomodate the general sense of the proposal in issue  
> 4069 Asir Vedamuthu
> DONE.  See:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0081.html
>
> ACTION-171 Raise this technical issue (form of the portType/ 
> operation/message designator) with jonathan Paul Cotton
>
> ACTION-172 Produce a proposal for resolving issue 4041 by January  
> 10 Editors
>
> ACTION-173 Add the change proposal to Issue 4045 Christopher Ferris
>
> ACTION-174 See what XPointer are in line with WSDL and syntax David  
> Orchard
>
> ACTION-175 Open an issue related to operations with the same name.  
> Fabian Ritzmann
> Status: DONE
> See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Jan/ 
> 0001.html
>
> ACTION-176 Revise proposal to accommodate Chris Ferris's ideas.  
> Umit to assist. Issue 3953. Coordinate with MaryAnn and Chris  
> Ferris. Frederick Hirsch
> Status: Done
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0090.html
> See below
>
> 6. Last Call Reviews from other WGs
>
> a) C14N 1.1 Last Call review announcement, XML Core WG
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2006OctDec/0109.html
>
> Paul's previous review from Oct 2006:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Oct/0142
> Status: Paul is trying to determine if the Last Call documents have  
> changed from the WDs he reviewed in Oct.
>
> 7. Last Call Framework and Attachment Issues
>
> a) ISSUE 4069: Updating References for Use of xml:id
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4069
> See note from Asir:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0041.html
>
> ACTION-170 Work with Monica on a concrete proposal for changes to  
> the Primer to accomodate the general sense of the proposal in issue  
> 4069 Asir Vedamuthu
> DONE.  See:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0081.html
>
> b) ISSUE 4128: Add References to WSDL 1.1 and WSDL 2.0 Component  
> Syntax, Ashok
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Jan/0003.html
>
> c) ISSUE 4129: Attaching Policies to EPRs, Ashok
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Jan/0004.html
>
> d) ISSUE 4130: Ignorable assertion must be ignored, Ashok
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Jan/0005.html
>
> 8. Primer Doc Issues
>
> a) ACTION-152 Review 4.4.8 with respect to the addition of the  
> ignorable attribute ("treasure island") due December 1, David Orchard
> DONE. See:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0070.html
> Status: David outlined his proposal at the Dec 20 meeting.  The WG  
> has until Jan 3 to decide if it should be adopted.
>
> b) (NEW) ISSUE 4041: Update primer to mention ignorable as needed,  
> Frederick
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4041
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0026.html
>
> ACTION-172 Produce a proposal for resolving issue 4041 by January  
> 10 Editors
>
> c) [NEW ISSUE] 4103 Questionable use of Contoso Ltd in Primer,  
> Chris Ferris
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4103
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0077.html
> See thread ending at:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0102.html
>
> 9. Guidelines issues
>
> a) 3953 - Remove language that use of security policy assertions  
> forces nested assertions for other domains, Frederick
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3953
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0039.html
> Status: Frederick's update proposal against more recent Guidelines  
> doc:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0008.html
> Revised proposal, closing Action-176:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0090.html
>
> ACTION-163 Work with Frederick to draft an example of the RM and  
> security composition requiring nesting Umit Yalcinalp 2006-12-13
> DONE. See:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0066.html
>
> ACTION-176 Revise proposal to accommodate Chris Ferris\\\\' ideas.  
> Umit to assist. Issue 3953. Coordinate with MaryAnn and Chris  
> Ferris. Frederick Hirsch
> Status: Done
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0090.html
>
> b) 3979 Clarify the guidance in section 5.9.1 on referencing policy  
> expressions, Dan Roth
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3979
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0104.html
>
> ACTION-164 Try to write up alternative text that takes into  
> consideration today\\'s discussion on issue 3979
> DONE. See:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0071.html
>
> c) ISSUE 4072: Statements not relevant to assertion design, Dan
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4072
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0046.html
> Fabian's response:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0063.html
>
> d) ISSUE 4073: Free standing statements, Asir
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4073
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0049.html
>
> e) ISSUE 4074: Collection of unclear Guidance or text issues, Dan
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4074
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0053.html
> See exchange between Dan and Umit at:
>         http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/ 
> 2006Dec/0085.html
>
> f) ISSUE 4040: [Guidelines] Update guidelines to include discussion  
> of ignorable, Frederick
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4040
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0025.html
>
> g) 3978 Clarify if Section 7 on defining new policy attachment  
> mechanisms is necessary, Dan Roth
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3978
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0102.html
> Maryann's response:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0131.html
>
> h) 3989 Suggested format for the Guidelines document., Asir
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3989
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0113.html
> Maryann's response:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0132.html
> Asir:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0139.html
> Umit:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0141.html
>
> i) 3988 Section 8 doesn't illustrate how to design an assertion., Asir
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3988
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0112.html
> Email discussion thread:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0000.html
>
> j) ISSUE 4035: [ Guidelines] Section 2 should account for interop  
> impact of non-wire or one-party assertions and ignorable property
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4035
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0007.html
>
> k) ISSUE (4074): [Guidelines] Collection of unclear Guidance or  
> text issues, Dan
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4074
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0053.html
>
> l) 3981 What is the relevance of Section 4 'Authoring Styles' to  
> policy
> assertion design?, Asir
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3981
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0107.html
> n) 3986 Parameters vs. Nested Policy decision at the Domain Level?,  
> Asir
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3986
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0110.html
>
> m) 3987 Section 5.9 - Lifecycle of Assertions?, Asir
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3987
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0111.html
>
> o) 3990 Content in Section 5.7 is unclear, Dan Roth
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3990
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0114.html
>
> 10. WSDL11 Element Identifiers
>
> a) Dec Editor's Draft:
> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/ws/policy/ 
> wsdl11elementidentifiers.html
> See note from David:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0048.html
>
> b) ACTION-156 OPEN Respond to 1.1 element names topic Ashok Malhotra
> DONE.  See:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0128.html
>
> ACTION-171 Raise this technical issue (form of the portType/ 
> operation/message designator) with jonathan Paul Cotton
>
> Ashok raised the matter with the WSDL WG.  See thread starting at:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0058.html
> See WSDL WG's response:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0092.html
> Also see the thread regarding the "In/Out" designators:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0100.html
>
> c) ISSUE 4045: Scoping WSDL1.1 identifiers to WS-Pol Att defined  
> attachment points
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4045
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0031.html
>
> ACTION-173 Add the change proposal to Issue 4045 Christopher Ferris
>
> d) 'Canonical form for WSDL 1.1 Element Identifiers', Paul
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0028.html
>
> ACTION-174 See what XPointer are in line with WSDL and syntax David  
> Orchard
>
> e) Support for operations with the same name, Fabian
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Dec/0065.html
>
> ACTION-175 Open an issue related to operations with the same name.  
> Fabian Ritzmann
>
> 11. Any other business
>
> 12. Adjourn
>
>
>
> Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
> 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3
> Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329
> mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 3 January 2007 15:23:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:20:45 GMT