- From: Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 09:11:42 -0500
- To: Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: public-ws-policy@w3.org, public-ws-policy-request@w3.org
Received on Friday, 8 December 2006 14:11:55 UTC
Per my AI, I have opened an issue: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4045 Cheers, Christopher Ferris STSM, Software Group Standards Strategy email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/chrisferris phone: +1 508 377 9295 public-ws-policy-request@w3.org wrote on 12/06/2006 11:32:21 AM: > > I believe that it would be most appropriate if the WG scoped its > work on the WSDL1.1 element identifiers > working group note to the specific set of WSDL1.1 policy attachment > points defined in the WS-Policy 1.5 - Attachments > specification. > > Going further than that would IMO be of marginal value to the WG and > would potentially add to the amount of effort > needed to complete the work. Our primary concern is with using these > identifiers > in the context of policy attachments. > > Cheers, > > Christopher Ferris > STSM, Software Group Standards Strategy > email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com > blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/chrisferris > phone: +1 508 377 9295
Received on Friday, 8 December 2006 14:11:55 UTC