W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-commits@w3.org > February 2012

csswg/css3-images lc-issues-1.txt,1.11,1.12

From: Elika Etemad via cvs-syncmail <cvsmail@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:41:30 +0000
To: public-css-commits@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1S2g2M-0006FG-K8@lionel-hutz.w3.org>
Update of /sources/public/csswg/css3-images
In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv23985

Modified Files:
	lc-issues-1.txt 
Log Message:
update issues list

Index: lc-issues-1.txt
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/csswg/css3-images/lc-issues-1.txt,v
retrieving revision 1.11
retrieving revision 1.12
diff -u -d -r1.11 -r1.12
--- lc-issues-1.txt	22 Feb 2012 02:09:07 -0000	1.11
+++ lc-issues-1.txt	29 Feb 2012 09:41:28 -0000	1.12
@@ -9,12 +9,16 @@
 Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jan/0635.html
 ----
 Issue 2.
-Summary:  Don't use prepositions in gradients
+Summary:  Don't use prepositions in linear-gradient()
 From:     Robert Biggs
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jan/0720.html
-Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jan/0783.html and http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jan/0939.html
+Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jan/0783.html
+Comment:  (private mail - accepted resolution for radial-gradient, but
+           didn't accept it for linear-gradient)
+Note:     http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Aug/0271.html
+Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0384.html
+Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0387.html
 Closed:   Rejected
-Verified: (private mail - accepted resolution for radial-gradient, but didn't accept it for linear-gradient)
 ----
 Issue 3.
 Summary:  Use of 'bounding box' is undefined, should be 'border box'
@@ -24,35 +28,40 @@
 Closed:   Accepted
 ----
 Issue 4.
-Summary:  Term 'element reference identifier' needs more explanation, examples, pointers to specs
+Summary:  'element reference identifier' underdefined
 From:     David Baron
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0253.html
 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0265.html
+Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1398.html
 Closed:   Accepted
 ----
 Issue 5.
-Summary:  The element() cycle detection algo phrasing implies an incremental algorithm.
+Summary:  The element() cycle detection algo phrasing implies an incremental
+          algorithm.
 From:     David Baron
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0251.html
 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0269.html
 Closed:   Accepted
 ----
 Issue 6.
-Summary:  The element() cycle detection algo misses cycles caused by host-language elements.
+Summary:  The element() cycle detection algo misses cycles caused by
+          host-language elements.
 From:     David Baron
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0254.html
 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0270.html
 Closed:   Accepted
 ----
 Issue 7.
-Summary:  The term "paint sources" is insufficiently defined, and should have explicit definitions for HTML and SVG.
+Summary:  The term "paint sources" is insufficiently defined, and should
+          have explicit definitions for HTML and SVG.
 From:     David Baron
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0252.html
 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0264.html
 Closed:   Accepted
 ----
 Issue 8.
-Summary:  HTML's definition of "paint source" only exists in the WHATWG version of HTML5, so it should be directly linked to.
+Summary:  HTML's definition of "paint source" only exists in the WHATWG
+          version of HTML5, so it should be directly linked to.
 From:     Leif Arne Storset
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0267.html
 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0271.html
@@ -66,7 +75,8 @@
 Closed:   Accepted
 ----
 Issue 10.
-Summary:  Concrete Object Size resolution algorithm has clumsy text, implying that only one dimension is resolved in one of the steps
+Summary:  Concrete Object Size resolution algorithm has clumsy text,
+          implying that only one dimension is resolved in one of the steps
 From:     Kenny Lu
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0395.html
 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0518.html
@@ -80,14 +90,14 @@
 Closed:   Accepted
 ----
 Issue 12.
-Summary:  element() needs to specify behavior when the selector matches multiple elements.
+Summary:  specify element() behavior when the selector matches multiple elements
 From:     Kenny Lu
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0394.html
 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0519.html
 Closed:   Accepted
 ----
 Issue 13.
-Summary:  image() should specify that its computed value has all absolute urls.
+Summary:  specify that relative image() urls compute to absolute
 From:     Kennu Lu
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0393.html
 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0696.html
@@ -99,10 +109,11 @@
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0388.html
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1049.html
 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1102.html
-Closed:   Partially Accepted - keep requirement, but add a generalized form of the commenter's idea as well, as suggested by fantasai
+Closed:   Partially Accepted - keep requirement, but add a generalized form
+          of the commenter's idea as well, as suggested by fantasai
 ----
 Issue 15.
-Summary:  Spec should better define how image-orientation interacts with EXIF data
+Summary:  Better define how image-orientation interacts with EXIF data
 From:     Simon Fraser
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0311.html
 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0877.html
@@ -126,7 +137,8 @@
 Verified: (Verified as part of in-person discussion during the February CSSWG f2f.)
 ----
 Issue 18.
-Summary:  Define 'dpi' and 'dpcm' in terms of the real physical units, not the CSS units
+Summary:  Define 'dpi' and 'dpcm' in terms of the real physical units,
+          not the CSS units
 From:     Kenny Lu
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0408.html
 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0430.html
@@ -141,14 +153,16 @@
 Closed:   Accepted
 ----
 Issue 20.
-Summary:  It's unclear if image-resolution is supposed to apply to images specified in CSS
+Summary:  It's unclear if image-resolution is supposed to apply to images
+          specified in CSS
 From:     Simon Fraser
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0323.html
 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0329.html
 Closed:   Accepted
 ----
 Issue 21.
-Summary:  The spec points to Values & Units for a definition of <position>, but it's not defined there.
+Summary:  The spec points to Values & Units for a definition of <position>,
+          but it's not defined there.
 From:     Lea Verou
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jan/0950.html
 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1106.html
@@ -163,7 +177,8 @@
 Closed:   Accepted
 ----
 Issue 23.
-Summary:  Wording of 'object-fit:fill' seems to imply that the content box *must* be filled
+Summary:  Wording of 'object-fit:fill' seems to imply that the content box
+          *must* be filled
 From:     Leif Arne Storset
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0034.html
 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0099.html
@@ -175,4 +190,16 @@
 Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0036.html
 Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0098.html
 Closed:   Rejected
-Verified: 
\ No newline at end of file
+Verified: 
+----
+Issue 25.
+Summary:  specify alignment of varying-size pages for broken element()
+From:     fantasai
+Closed:   Accepted
+----
+Issue 26.
+Summary:  Allow image() to accept element()
+From:     TabAtkins
+Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0265.html
+Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1398.html
+Closed:   Accepted
Received on Wednesday, 29 February 2012 09:41:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:44:50 UTC